Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities

I bought into FINPX on Dec. 8, 2008, when the price per share was $10.25. I am selling today when the price is $12.16. This is a tax-free account. That is a capital gain of 18.6% over three years, above and beyond the regular interest distributions.

Honestly, I did expect some capital gain in this fund, because I was buying in the heart of the U.S. financial crisis. But in reality, the capital gain is the reason I am selling. My feeling is that TIPS yields are well below the historical norm, and eventually the trend will return to normal. This is the case with all Treasury issues, not just TIPS. This is the last TIPS mutual fund I own. I don’t own a TIPS ETF.

(As I have noted before, I do advocate buying and holding TIPS to maturity, either through TreasuryDirect.gov or in a tax-free retirement account. I am not dismissing TIPS as an investment, quite the contrary, I still a large portion of my portfolio in TIPS and I Bonds. But I feel TIPS mutual funds and ETFs are reaching a risky point.)

So, where did I reinvest this money? In another ‘boring’ investment, Fidelity Total Bond Market (FTBFX). The other fund I considered was Fidelity Intermediate Bond (FTHRX), which tracks very close to the Total Bond Market.

Here is a chart of the performance of these three funds over the last two years:

Amazingly, all three funds have a very similar capital return (and a very nice return) over the last two years. But the FINPX TIPS fund shows much stronger swings, and is on a very strong upswing right now. That is why I am exiting.

I prefer the boredom of the Total Bond Fund. Boring is good.

The TIPS fund is booming with the current surge in Treasury securities. I think that will pass. When it does pass, and TIPS yields return to a more historical level, I would be fine with returning to FINPX.

Brett Arends of MarketWatch.com wrote an ROI column this week sharply criticizing TIPS and the ‘suckers’ who buy them. Great headline: ‘Holding TIPS will make you poorer.’

Would you buy an investment that was absolutely guaranteed to lose money? No ifs, ands or buts: This sucker will make you poorer! How’s that sound? You might think this is a crazy question. You’re probably thinking, who would choose to own an investment that is guaranteed to lose money?

Arends argues that buying a 10-year TIPS with a base interest rate of less than 1% – or a 5-year with a base yield dipping into the negative – is ‘crazy, totally nuts.’ He also points out that the Consumer Price Index is a lousy way to measure inflation.

I agree with and understand his points.

My criticism: Arends doesn’t offer an investment alternative for the super-safe portion of your portfolio. And that is the problem.

Would you rather buy a 5-year CD at the local bank, now paying about 2.4%, or have a Treasury instrument (no state income taxes) that pays the rate of inflation minus 0.18% (the rate of the last 5-year auction)? At the least, it is a tossup, since the TIPS has inflation protection and the CD doesn’t.

Would you rather buy a conventional 5-year Treasury today, now paying an absurd 1.78%? That is an easy choice: I would go with the TIPS in this case. The inflation protection is a lot more valuable than getting 1.78% on your money, which is highly likely to produce a real return well below the -0.18% of the April 5-year TIPS.

(I contend that for a small investor, the U.S. I Bond is a better investment for your first $5,000 invested, since its base yield is locked at zero and it offers the same inflation protection. Zero is better than negative.)

The reason TIPS yields have gone negative is because the conventional Treasury yields have dipped to extreme lows, well below the likely rate of inflation over the next 5 years. So there is some logic to buying TIPS, to capture the rate of inflation (even at a slight penalty).

But I agree: Buying TIPS and holding them to maturity is not a ‘fabulous’ investment right now. It is OK. It is safe. It is a do-it-and-forget-it investment. (But I definitely would not dump a major portion of a portfolio into TIPS at the moment.)

And TIPS mutual funds are risky. Eventually the base rate on TIPS is going to climb back toward the historical yield of 2%, and TIPS mutual funds will get clobbered.

Although we don’t yet have full details, we know the Treasury will announce on Thursday, May 12, 2011, an auction of a 10-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Security. The auction date will be May 19 and the settlement date May 31.

The last comparable TIPS auction was a 9-year, 10-month reissue on March 31 that carried a coupon rate of 1.125% and a base yield set by the auction at 0.92%. (That is the yield the buyer receives until maturity, with the principal rising with inflation over the 10 years.)

The May 19 auction also is a reissue. The base yield is likely to be set by the auction around 0.68%, based on where rates were Tuesday, May 4.

My favorite quote from a Reuters story about the March 2011 auction:

“If there’s anything that’s unpredictable, it’s a TIPS auction,” said Tom Simons, money market economist at Jefferies & Co in New York.

Jason Zweig makes an excellent observations in his April 30 Intelligent Investor column in the Wall Street Journal: Don’t trust the yield quotes you see for some (not all) TIPS mutual funds.

Among the 173 TIPS mutual funds tracked by Morningstar, the reported “SEC yields” as of March 31 ranged from minus-0.77% to 5.58%, with 12 funds yielding at least 5%. Four of the seven exchange-traded funds that specialize in TIPS displayed yields greater than 5%, with Pimco 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index leading the pack at 6.07%.

Yet no TIPS yield more than 1.75%. How could anyone but an alchemist generate 5% or more out of 1.75% or less?

The answer lies hidden in the term “SEC yield.”

In theory, since inflation can jump in a single month, as is did recently to 0.5%, you could annualize that rate to look like inflation is running at 6%, which it isn’t.

Take a look at the iShares TIP ETF, which can demonstrate the issue. On the fund’s data page, the 30-day SEC yield is listed as 5.59% — accurate but misleading. On the other hand, iShares also lists the Average Real Yield to maturity as 0.2% and the 12-month yield as 2.76%.

The data page for the Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities Fund Investor Shares (VIPSX) intentionally underestimates its annualized yield, which is a ‘miserable’ -0.09%. But on Vanguard’s Website a box also pops up when you mouse over that rate:

The yield quoted is the real yield, or the yield before adjusting for inflation. The actual yield of Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities Fund will be a combination of the real yield and an inflation adjustment. A complete estimate of the fund’s yield requires that an estimate of future inflation be added to the real yield. Because inflation fluctuates, it cannot be projected into the future precisely enough to be included in the yield quote. The inflation adjustment is based on changes to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and can be either positive or negative, based on the change to the CPI. Investors interested in maintaining the purchasing power of their investment should invest their dividend distributions.

Vanguard is doing this right.