By David Enna, Tipswatch.com
In his his interview last week with Time magazine, President Trump mentioned, in an off-hand way, that inflation could be the solution to the nation’s $40 trillion national debt. This is something a president should NEVER say.
You can read the full text of the interview here.
Here are excerpts of Trump’s comments during a discussion of U.S. debt, the Federal Reserve, interest rates and inflation:
Trump: How do you ever pay off the debt? Now you can do it through other means. I know I’m the best in the world. The best—I don’t want to tell you what those means are, but you can pay off the debt through other means. …
Now, when you talk about the debt, the growth is going to pay off the debt. Growth will pay it off. Now, it’s pretty bad when they (the Federal Reserve) keep raising interest rates, and they only raise them because they have Trump derangement syndrome. … they would rather see the country do badly because I’m President. …
We should be the lowest interest rate with the most prime country — we should be the lowest interest rate in the world. …
Q: Well, they’re concerned that the economy is too hot.
Trump: No, they’re concerned for inflation.
Q. Well, yeah, exactly.
Trump: Okay, and frankly, this is hurting our country more than inflation is hurting our country. More than inflation. You know, inflation. Certain levels of inflation will also pay off that debt very rapidly. Very rapidly.
At this point, White House communications adviser Steven Cheung interrupted the interview, saying: “Can I just jump in? We’re coming up for about an hour.” That put an end to the inflation discussion, but the interview continued focused on midterm-election politics.
The problem
“Certain levels of inflation will also pay off that debt very rapidly. Very rapidly.“
It’s impossible to say exactly what Trump meant by this, but it is a dangerous statement, suggesting that the United States could “inflate away” $40 trillion in debt. It set off controversy, and had Bitcoin traders celebrating.
The president’s remarks touched on a long-running fear of some bond investors: that Washington might try to inflate away its debt by letting rising prices shrink the burden of what it owes, at bondholders’ expense.
It was an outcome that droves of economists warned was coming: higher inflation being tolerated—consciously or otherwise—to bring down the value of America’s $40 trillion national debt. …
In its simplest form, above-target inflation would erode the value of existing debt, allowing the government to repurchase or refinance at relatively cheaper rates.
Trump’s comments confirm a possible scenario suggested by analysts with JPMorgan last year.
“We could see a less straightforward path to reduce the U.S. government’s debt load,” the bank’s researchers wrote. “Policymakers could erode Fed independence and effectively inflate the debt away by driving a stronger nominal growth environment characterized by higher inflation and, over the near term at least, lower real interest rates.”
Can this strategy work?
First of all, maintaining the value of the U.S. dollar and its status as the world’s reserve currency should be a sacred goal for every U.S. president, every member of Congress and every governor of the Federal Reserve. We can’t be sure what Trump meant by his comment, but using “certain levels of inflation” to help erase the nation’s debt is a horrible idea.
How about cutting spending? Or raising taxes? Or obviously … both. If you want lower interest rates, and lower inflation, that is the correct path.
I asked ChatGPT if high inflation could be a viable solution to the nation’s debt:
The basic mechanism does work. Suppose the government has $40 trillion of nominal, fixed-rate debt outstanding.
If inflation unexpectedly runs at 5% for a year, the purchasing power of that $40 trillion falls by roughly 5%. In real terms, the debt would be worth about $38 trillion in today’s dollars.
After 10 years of 5% inflation, the purchasing power of a dollar would be only about 61% of what it was initially. So if the government could keep the interest rates on its existing debt fixed, inflation would substantially erode the real value of that debt.
One key point: To make the strategy work, the government would need to keep interest rates on its existing debt stable, or lower, despite the high level of inflation. And of course, government spending on Social Security, Medicare, defense spending, construction, etc., would all rise with inflation.
At the same time, government revenues would increase if wages also increased to match the rate of inflation and tax rates remained stable.
Would the Fed join in?
The U.S. Treasury market could be shattered by any strategy to use inflation to lower future debts. Investors in nominal Treasurys would see purchasing power continuously decline in value. They would demand higher and higher interest rates (much as we are seeing today, but higher.)
To get the full effect of this strategy, the Federal Reserve would have to implement a new wave of bond-buying quantitative easing, forcing interest rates lower. ChatGPT provided a nice summary of the entire strategy:
Higher inflation → investors demand higher yields → Fed buys Treasuries → Treasury yields suppressed → government continues borrowing relatively cheaply → inflation erodes the real value of existing debt.
I think this is highly unlikely. It won’t happen.
The attraction of TIPS and I Bonds
Because Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities and Series I Savings Bonds offer a return tied to official U.S. inflation, these investments could perform very well in a scenario of high inflation tied to lower or stable real yields.
If U.S. inflation rises to 6%, TIPS and I Bonds are going to at least match that rate of inflation. This is the “Goldilocks” scenario for inflation-protected investments. The rest of the U.S. economy would suffer, however.
A caveat: In a nightmare scenario, the U.S. government could begin manipulating inflation data (in other words, lying) to suppress payments for TIPS and I Bonds, and at the same time holding down entitlement spending.
For many retired people without inflation-protected investments, a higher inflation strategy could be devastating. Fixed-rate annuity or pension payments would steadily decline in purchasing power, and nest-egg savings would get strained by higher costs.
Conclusion
No. No. No. The United States cannot simply cave in and attempt to inflate away its debt. That is an amazingly irresponsible strategy. The real solution involves a commitment to fiscal responsibility — cutting spending and raising taxes. And the Federal Reserve needs to maintain its strong commitment to holding inflation in check.
What do you think? Post your comments below, but keep the conversation civil and on topic. Political diatribes will be deleted.
Also see:
—————————

Donate? This site is free and I hope to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I welcome donations, any amount. And FYI, ads on this site pay for about one visit to Costco.
—————————
Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).
Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.
David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.





























Yes, that is the cause of the danger. States and cities balance their budgets, along with borrowing. The United States…