Trump just opened the Pandora’s box of inflation

AI-generated image. Perchance.org

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

In his his interview last week with Time magazine, President Trump mentioned, in an off-hand way, that inflation could be the solution to the nation’s $40 trillion national debt. This is something a president should NEVER say.

You can read the full text of the interview here.

Here are excerpts of Trump’s comments during a discussion of U.S. debt, the Federal Reserve, interest rates and inflation:

Trump: How do you ever pay off the debt? Now you can do it through other means. I know I’m the best in the world. The best—I don’t want to tell you what those means are, but you can pay off the debt through other means. …

Now, when you talk about the debt, the growth is going to pay off the debt. Growth will pay it off. Now, it’s pretty bad when they (the Federal Reserve) keep raising interest rates, and they only raise them because they have Trump derangement syndrome. … they would rather see the country do badly because I’m President. …

We should be the lowest interest rate with the most prime country — we should be the lowest interest rate in the world. …

Q: Well, they’re concerned that the economy is too hot.

Trump: No, they’re concerned for inflation.

Q. Well, yeah, exactly.

Trump: Okay, and frankly, this is hurting our country more than inflation is hurting our country. More than inflation. You know, inflation. Certain levels of inflation will also pay off that debt very rapidly. Very rapidly.

At this point, White House communications adviser Steven Cheung interrupted the interview, saying: “Can I just jump in? We’re coming up for about an hour.” That put an end to the inflation discussion, but the interview continued focused on midterm-election politics.

The problem

“Certain levels of inflation will also pay off that debt very rapidly. Very rapidly.“

It’s impossible to say exactly what Trump meant by this, but it is a dangerous statement, suggesting that the United States could “inflate away” $40 trillion in debt. It set off controversy, and had Bitcoin traders celebrating.

Wall Street Journal:

The president’s remarks touched on a long-running fear of some bond investors: that Washington might try to inflate away its debt by letting rising prices shrink the burden of what it owes, at bondholders’ expense.

Fortune:

It was an outcome that droves of economists warned was coming: higher inflation being tolerated—consciously or otherwise—to bring down the value of America’s $40 trillion national debt. …

In its simplest form, above-target inflation would erode the value of existing debt, allowing the government to repurchase or refinance at relatively cheaper rates.

Forbes:

Trump’s comments confirm a possible scenario suggested by analysts with JPMorgan last year.

“We could see a less straightforward path to reduce the U.S. government’s debt load,” the bank’s researchers wrote. “Policymakers could erode Fed independence and effectively inflate the debt away by driving a stronger nominal growth environment characterized by higher inflation and, over the near term at least, lower real interest rates.”

Can this strategy work?

First of all, maintaining the value of the U.S. dollar and its status as the world’s reserve currency should be a sacred goal for every U.S. president, every member of Congress and every governor of the Federal Reserve. We can’t be sure what Trump meant by his comment, but using “certain levels of inflation” to help erase the nation’s debt is a horrible idea.

How about cutting spending? Or raising taxes? Or obviously … both. If you want lower interest rates, and lower inflation, that is the correct path.

I asked ChatGPT if high inflation could be a viable solution to the nation’s debt:

The basic mechanism does work. Suppose the government has $40 trillion of nominal, fixed-rate debt outstanding.

If inflation unexpectedly runs at 5% for a year, the purchasing power of that $40 trillion falls by roughly 5%. In real terms, the debt would be worth about $38 trillion in today’s dollars.

After 10 years of 5% inflation, the purchasing power of a dollar would be only about 61% of what it was initially. So if the government could keep the interest rates on its existing debt fixed, inflation would substantially erode the real value of that debt.

One key point: To make the strategy work, the government would need to keep interest rates on its existing debt stable, or lower, despite the high level of inflation. And of course, government spending on Social Security, Medicare, defense spending, construction, etc., would all rise with inflation.

At the same time, government revenues would increase if wages also increased to match the rate of inflation and tax rates remained stable.

Would the Fed join in?

The U.S. Treasury market could be shattered by any strategy to use inflation to lower future debts. Investors in nominal Treasurys would see purchasing power continuously decline in value. They would demand higher and higher interest rates (much as we are seeing today, but higher.)

To get the full effect of this strategy, the Federal Reserve would have to implement a new wave of bond-buying quantitative easing, forcing interest rates lower. ChatGPT provided a nice summary of the entire strategy:

Higher inflation → investors demand higher yields → Fed buys Treasuries → Treasury yields suppressed → government continues borrowing relatively cheaply → inflation erodes the real value of existing debt.

I think this is highly unlikely. It won’t happen.

The attraction of TIPS and I Bonds

Because Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities and Series I Savings Bonds offer a return tied to official U.S. inflation, these investments could perform very well in a scenario of high inflation tied to lower or stable real yields.

If U.S. inflation rises to 6%, TIPS and I Bonds are going to at least match that rate of inflation. This is the “Goldilocks” scenario for inflation-protected investments. The rest of the U.S. economy would suffer, however.

A caveat: In a nightmare scenario, the U.S. government could begin manipulating inflation data (in other words, lying) to suppress payments for TIPS and I Bonds, and at the same time holding down entitlement spending.

For many retired people without inflation-protected investments, a higher inflation strategy could be devastating. Fixed-rate annuity or pension payments would steadily decline in purchasing power, and nest-egg savings would get strained by higher costs.

Conclusion

No. No. No. The United States cannot simply cave in and attempt to inflate away its debt. That is an amazingly irresponsible strategy. The real solution involves a commitment to fiscal responsibility — cutting spending and raising taxes. And the Federal Reserve needs to maintain its strong commitment to holding inflation in check.

What do you think? Post your comments below, but keep the conversation civil and on topic. Political diatribes will be deleted.

Also see:

—————————

Donate? This site is free and I hope to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I welcome donations, any amount. And FYI, ads on this site pay for about one visit to Costco.

PayPal link / Venmo link

—————————

Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Federal Reserve, I Bond, Inflation, Investing in TIPS, Medicare, Retirement, Savings Bond, Social Security | 32 Comments

Tremors are rippling across the U.S. Treasury market

Yields are soaring. Is inflation the cause? Not exactly.

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, when criticized, often says the United States has the “best-performing bond market in the developed world.” As evidence, he points to successful Treasury auctions in recent months.

But then came the $70 billion auction of a 5-year Treasury note on September 23. The auction generated a shocking result: A nominal yield of 5.033%, up 64 basis points from the same auction in August; it was the highest yield for this term since June 2006. The bid-to-cover ratio was weak at 2.21.

That was followed by last week’s 7-year Treasury note auction with a similar result: A high yield of 5.085%, up 57 basis points from the August result.

This led to a troubling Wall Street Journal headline: “A Perfect Storm Is Raging in the Bond Market“.

From an intractable conflict in Iran to a seemingly indestructible U.S. economy, it just “doesn’t make sense to a lot of people to own bonds here,” said Christopher Sullivan, chief investment officer at the United Nations Federal Credit Union. … All in, it was the worst day in nearly 18 months for U.S. government bonds.

Ironically, this surge in longer-term Treasury yields comes a month after Bessent launched a repurchase effort to lower the Treasury’s costs of borrowing, a move that was poorly received by the bond market. Three weeks later, the Federal Reserve raised its key short-term interest rate by 25 basis points, more or less counteracting Bessent’s efforts.

From Bloomberg last week:

“It’s rare you get a move like this in bonds,” said Dave Aspell, co-chief investment officer at Mount Lucas Management LP. “The Fed has hiked again, inflation is clearly not at target. The economy is doing okay and there’s a large amount of government spending.”

Can we talk about U.S. debt?

In my opinion, today’s interest rates are where you would expect them to be in an environment of strong economic growth, excessive federal deficits, soaring corporate borrowing for an AI build-out, falling foreign demand for U.S. debt, and supply-shock inflation rolling across the nation.

Why is there such a great need for the Treasury to borrow? And at lower rates? Let’s take a look.

Click on image for larger version

Through the 10 years of Trump-Biden-Trump presidencies, the U.S. debt has more than doubled to $40.2 trillion. The increase appears to be accelerating in the wake of Big Beautiful Bill tax cuts and massive spending dedicated to the war with Iran.

Obviously, higher deficits mean higher borrowing by the Treasury and that is coming at a time of higher interest rates. There you go … a perfect storm.

The Treasury is projecting that interest expenses for the U.S. government will increase to $1.27 trillion in fiscal 2026 (which ends this month) — and that was with 3.49% borrowing costs. Both the amount of borrowing and the interest costs will rise in fiscal 2027. The 4-week T-bill is now trading at 4.04% and is likely to go higher.

With the U.S. government expecting about $5.6 trillion in revenue for fiscal 2026, interest expense is now 23% of revenue.

Consider this: The U.S. deficit of $40 trillion caused $1.27 trillion in interest expense this fiscal year, which adds to the deficit. At 4.25%, interest on just that interest will cost well over $55 billion in fiscal 2027.

Foreign demand is slipping

After 20 months of bullying, insulting, and tariffing its strongest allies, the United States could be triggering a buyer’s strike among foreign central banks. This is a difficult premise to confirm, however.

There is some evidence of a buyer’s strike in the Treasury’s report titled “International Capital Data for June“. It shows that net foreign purchases of U.S. T-bills fell from $250.5 billion in the 12 months through June 2025 to just $49.4 billion in the 12 months through June 2026. Inflows to Treasury bonds and notes also fell from $561.1 billion to $329.3 in July 2026.

This is fairly strong evidence that foreign buyers, including central banks, aren’t as willing to pour money into U.S. Treasurys. It could be a side-effect of tariffs, because trade surpluses with the United States result in U.S. dollars that are often invested in the U.S. Treasury market.

The main point is that declining inflows of foreign investments in U.S. Treasurys — at a time of rising borrowing needs — cause demand to soften and yields to rise, as we have seen.

The inflation factor

I often hear financial commentators point to rising inflation expectations as a root cause of higher Treasury yields. Certainly, inflation is a factor, but not a primary factor. U.S. all-items inflation is currently running at 3.4%, above trends of the last two years because of the oil shock triggered by the Iran war. Take out food and energy and you get core inflation at 2.4%, the lowest rate in more than five years.

Real yields are rising, and so you might assume inflation has to be the reason. But it isn’t. In fact, I would argue that real yields are rising simply because nominal yields are rising. From Reuters last week:

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland President ‌Beth Hammack said ‌on Friday that surging bond yields ​are not being pushed up by inflation fears. When it comes to the jump ‌in government ⁠bond yields, “it’s real rates that have moved ⁠up more than the inflation expectations,” Hammack said.

“We’re ‌reasonably well anchored from an inflation expectations perspective” and rising bond yields reflect a solid economic outlook, ‌competition for investor ​cash due to ​strong ​tech sector investment, ‌as well as market ​participants ​adjusting prices to deal with the monetary policy ​outlook, ‌the official said.

Click on image for larger version.

In this chart, notice the gap between the 10-year nominal yield, which is surging, and the 10-year real yield, which is also surging — at nearly the identical pace. The gap is the 10-year inflation breakeven rate, which is a measure of inflation expectations. Here is the breakeven trend for the same period:

Click on image for larger version.

This chart shows inflation expectations have been remarkably stable over the last four years. I consider this pattern highly unusual, and it shows that inflation is NOT the primary cause of elevated real and nominal yields. In fact, if inflation expectations were the key factor, real yields would be declining versus nominal yields, resulting in a higher inflation breakeven rate.

In essence, TIPS and nominal bonds are trading at equilibrium — yields for both are rising, indicating weaker demand for both at a time of higher borrowing needs.

Conclusion

“You can’t keep dumping duration into a market that doesn’t want it.”

That quote is from economist Freya Beamish in her excellent (and entertaining) team podcast, Perkins vs. Beamish. The latest episode is titled, “Buy the Bond Blow-Up?“

I’m going to say again that today’s elevated real and nominal Treasury yields reflect our current reality of a healthy U.S. economy, strong job market, surging borrowing needs, depressed foreign investments, and supply-shock energy prices that could begin spreading across the U.S. economy.

What changed in recent weeks? First, we got the Treasury secretary attempting a slippery run-around to lower longer-term yields (failed). Then the war with Iran expanded into a regional conflict, sending oil prices higher. And then the Federal Reserve raised interest rates, probably the first of several increases into next year.

Add to that about $400 billion in corporate borrowing in 2026 to fund the AI build-out. For the bond market, this is “the new normal.”

For what it’s worth, let’s end with a “more pain to come” video featuring Grace Peters, co-head of JP Morgan Private Banks’s Global Investment Strategy:

Also see:

—————————

Donate? This site is free and I hope to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I welcome donations, any amount. And FYI, ads on this site pay for about one visit to Costco.

PayPal link / Venmo link

—————————

Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Cash alternatives, Federal Reserve, I Bond, Inflation, Investing in TIPS, Tariffs, Treasury Bills | Tagged , , | 32 Comments

TIPS vs. I Bonds: Let’s do the math

TIPS are more attractive, but the I Bond’s fixed rate will be rising.

AI image, Perchance.org

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

While Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities and Series I Savings Bonds are both inflation-tracking investments, they each have a unique quality:

  • TIPS are reactive, with prices and real yields changing by the hour to reflect the current market value on the secondary market.
  • I Bonds are retroactive, with a real yield and interest rate locked in place for six months, based on market trends many months ago. There is no secondary market.

These qualities can work in favor of both investments. In past years, when the Federal Reserve was forcing real yields lower (and often negative), I Bonds had a huge advantage in real yield over TIPS, sometimes by as much as 150 basis points. But that is not the case today.

Market real yields have been soaring in 2026, pushing the 5-year real yield from 1.46% on January 1 to 2.55% at the close on Friday. Meanwhile, the I Bond’s fixed rate, which is equivalent to its real yield, has remained at 0.90% through the entire year.

I consider the 5-year TIPS and I Bond to be comparable investments. The I Bond can be redeemed without penalty after 5 years, matching the maturity of the TIPS. So when you see the 5-year TIPS real yield rise 109 basis points compared to zero for the I Bond, this is an easy conclusion: TIPS are the better investment.

It’s true, though, that I Bonds have several advantages over TIPS: tax-deferred interest, much better deflation protection, a flexible maturity, continual compounding of interest, and accumulated principal that can never go down in value. For that reason, I think a “fair value” fixed rate for the I Bond is equal to a ratio of 0.65 applied to the 5-year TIPS real yield.

Today, that ratio is only 0.35 (0.9/2.55 = 0.35). TIPS are a better value. This chart compares the 5-year real yield to the I Bond’s fixed rate since November 2023. Clearly, the ratio has moved way out of whack in recent months, as the I Bond’s fixed rate remains locked in at 0.9%.

Click on image for larger version.

Conclusion. TIPS have a large yield advantage over I Bonds, especially for purchases through October. On November 1, the I Bond’s fixed rate is highly likely to go up, and the new composite rate should be attractive. Let’s scope out that upcoming reset.

Fixed rate: At least 1.30%

All my forecasts for the I Bond’s fixed rate are based on this formula: Take the average 5-year real yield over the preceding 6 months and apply a ratio of 0.65. This formula has been an accurate predictor for more than a decade. But of course, the Treasury could decide to ditch it. Let’s assume they won’t. Here’s the history:

Fixed-rate projection. As of Friday’s market close, the 5-year real yield had averaged 1.951134 from May 1 to September 18. Applying the 0.65 ratio results in a new fixed rate of 1.30%, up from the current 0.90%.

There is nearly zero chance that the fixed rate will fall below 1.30%, if the Treasury follows its traditional rate-setting methods. There are only 29 market days remaining before the reset. As the chart shows, even if the 5-year real yield miraculously dropped to 2.0% for all 29 days, the fixed rate projection remains at 1.30%.

However, if the real yield continues at the current rate of 2.50% or higher, the rate will rise to 1.40%, which would be the highest fixed rate since a reset in November 2006. This is probably a long-shot but is certainly in play.

I think a new fixed rate of 1.30% looks like the most likely result.

Remember that the I Bond’s fixed rate is permanent and is usually the most important factor in an I Bond investment. The exception is for an investor looking for a short-term investment with a high composite rate.

Variable rate

Although just one month of inflation (for September) remains in the six-month rate-setting string, this is a difficult projection. Monthly inflation has been volatile this summer, but rising gas prices this month point to a boost. How much? I’d guess something close to 0.35% to 0.40% for the month.

An increase of 0.35% in non-seasonally adjusted inflation in September would give you a 6-month inflation number of 1.79%, which translates to a new variable rate of 3.58%, higher than the current 3.34%. That’s an estimate!

Composite rate

If the reset settles in at 1.30% fixed and 3.58% variable, the resulting composite rate would be 4.90%, much higher than the current 4.26%. That is attractive. Again, this is an estimate. Many readers have told me they were waiting for the November reset to buy their 2026 allocation — $10,000 per person per year. It looks like waiting will have paid off.

Even I Bonds with a 0.0% fixed rate would be getting a composite rate of 3.58% for six months. Not awful. (My Fidelity Treasury money market fund is paying 3.4%.)

Qualifications

Even if the fixed rate rises to 1.40%, the math will favor TIPS. Using the 0.65 ratio versus a 5-year TIPS at 2.55%, the I Bond gets a fair-value fixed rate of 1.70%. At least 1.40% is getting closer.

I would not be surprised, however, if we get a dip in real yields in coming months. The recent run-up has been dramatic. But yields could continue rising if inflation surges higher and the Federal Reserve triggers another rate hike in October or December.

Another qualification for I Bond purchases is TreasuryDirect’s transition to ID.me for login verification, which hard-launches Oct. 28. A lot of people have been troubled by the move, since ID.me is a private company. Does that reduce the attractiveness of I Bonds, which can only be purchased at TreasuryDirect?

My feeling is that a fixed rate of 1.30% or 1.40% will be attractive enough for a purchase in 2027. I can adapt to the ID.me login. The new fixed rate will be available for purchase through April 2027. I will return to this topic in mid-October, after the release of the September inflation report on October 14.

See: TreasuryDirect is launching a controversial login system

And: TreasuryDirect provides more guidance on ID.me transition

• Confused by I Bonds? Read my Q&A on I Bonds

• Wise advice: ‘Don’t die with I Bonds’

• Let’s ‘try’ to clarify how an I Bond’s interest is calculated

• Inflation and I Bonds: Track the variable rate changes

• I Bonds: Here’s a simple way to track current value

• I Bond Manifesto: How this investment can work as an emergency fund

—————————

Donate? This site is free and I hope to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I welcome donations, any amount. And FYI, ads on this site pay for about one visit to Costco.

PayPal link / Venmo link

—————————

Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Cash alternatives, I Bond, Inflation, Investing in TIPS, Savings Bond, TreasuryDirect | Tagged , , | 41 Comments

10-year TIPS reopening gets real yield of 2.653%, highest in nearly 18 years

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

The Treasury’s offering of $19 billion in a reopened Treasury Inflation-Protected Security, CUSIP 91282CRE3, generated a real yield to maturity of 2.653%, the highest for this term since an auction in October 2008.

Investor demand at the auction appeared to be a bit weak, in the wake of a Federal Reserve decision to raise interest rates on Wednesday, and signal that more increases could be coming. The auction’s bid-to-cover ratio was 2.24, the lowest for this term in a year. The “when-issued” prediction used by bond traders was 2.634%. The higher resulting yield indicates less-than-stellar demand.

For today’s auction investors, however, this adds up to good news. The real yield of 2.653% was 22 basis points higher than result for this TIPS’ originating auction on July 23, and a whopping 75 basis points higher than a similar 10-year reopening auction on March 19.

Definition: The “real yield to maturity” of a TIPS is its yield above future U.S. inflation, over the term of the TIPS. So a real yield of 2.653% means an investment in this TIPS will provide a return that exceeds official U.S. inflation by 2.653% for 9 years, 10 months.

Here is the trend in 10-year real yields since January 2025:

Click on image for larger version.

In this chart, I have noted two crucial events: 1) The launch of U.S. tariffs in April 2025 and 2) the beginning of the U.S. war with Iran in March 2026. While tariffs caused real yields to immediately surge, the market returned to normal in a few months. The war with Iran, because of its inflationary dangers and resulting surge in government borrowing, has caused real yields to soar.

This is the path of annual all-items inflation over that same period, showing the apparent inflationary effects of tariffs and the obvious and more severe effects of the war and resulting energy crisis:

Real and nominal yields are rising for a reason. Inflation and government borrowing are not under control.

Pricing

The coupon rate for CUSIP 91282CRE3 was set at 2.375% by the originating auction in July. Because today’s real yield was higher, investors got a discounted unadjusted price of 97.612784. In addition, this TIPS will carry an inflation index of 0.99985 on the settlement date of September 30. With that information, we can calculate the cost of a $10,000 par-value investment at this auction:

  • Par value: $10,000.
  • Adjusted principal on settlement date: $10,000 x 0.99985 = $9,998.50.
  • Cost of investment: $9,998.50 x 0.97612784 = $9,759.81.
  • + accrued interest of $49.69

In summary, the investor paid $9,759.81 for $9,998.50 of principal on the settlement date of September 30. From then on, the investor will earn accruals matching future U.S. inflation, plus an annual coupon rate of 2.375% for 9 years, 10 months. The accrued interest will be returned at the next coupon payment in January.

Inflation breakeven rate

At the auction’s close, the 10-year Treasury note was trading with nominal yield of 4.95%, giving this TIPS an inflation breakeven rate of 2.30%, in line with recent results for this term. It means the TIPS will out-perform the nominal Treasury if inflation averages more than 2.3% over the next 9 years, 10 months.

Over the last 10 years, ending in August, inflation has averaged 3.4%. Here is the trend in the 10-year inflation breakeven rate since January 2025:

Click on image for larger version.

Thoughts

Today’s auction was a very good result for investors, netting the highest real yield since a similar auction in October 2008 — in the heart of a severe financial crisis — went off at 2.85%. There is no evidence of a crisis today, except for the excessive surge in U.S. government and corporate borrowing.

This TIPS will get another reopening auction on November 19 and then a new 10-year TIPS will be auctioned January 21, 2027. That January auction is my current target, so I hope yields remain elevated until then.

Were you an investor? Post your thoughts in the comments section. Here is a history of auctions for this term over the last two years:

• Now is an ideal time to build a TIPS ladder

• Confused by TIPS? Read my Q&A on TIPS

• TIPS in depth: Understand the language

• TIPS on the secondary market: Things to consider

• TIPS investor: Don’t over-think the threat of deflation

• Upcoming schedule of TIPS auctions

—————————

Donate? This site is free and I hope to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I welcome donations, any amount. And FYI, ads on this site pay for about one visit to Costco.

PayPal link / Venmo link

—————————

Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Federal Reserve, Inflation, Investing in TIPS, Tariffs | Tagged , , | 33 Comments

Here’s an illustrated guide to TreasuryDirect’s new login process

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

Based on reader feedback I’ve seen, it looks like most people are having no problems logging into TreasuryDirect‘s new system once they have completed verifying a login account with ID.me.

That’s good. The bigger problem, of course, is completing the ID.me verification process, which requires several steps. We are now in the “soft-launch” stage but an ID.me account will be required for access to TreasuryDirect beginning October 28.

This is a video created by the Social Security Administration to walk a user through the ID.me account-creation process. (I have no idea why TreasuryDirect has not created a similar video for its site):

The video details how a registrant using a computer would have to complete the process using a phone with a camera. The verification process is complex and can sometimes fail, especially when taking a “selfie photo.”

For more information, check ID.me’s guide to account setup.

The TreasuryDirect login

Once ID.me verification is properly completed, logging into TreasuryDirect is a simple process, as many readers have reported. TreasuryDirect did create a video for this part of the process. Here is the link (the video is not yet on YouTube).

My personal experience

As I have noted in past articles, my wife and each have a TreasuryDirect account. In the past, both accounts were linked to my email, so I could log into both and manage investments. My wife’s account is our “main account,” combining I Bonds (some redeemed this year) with a few T-bills and long-ago TIPS purchases. This is the account with the all-important tax documents. My account holds only I Bonds, and none have been redeemed in 2026.

My wife is currently traveling overseas. Before she left she attempted to set up an ID.me account, but I think that process was not completed. So set-up for that account will have to wait a few weeks.

Reminder: Under the ID.me process, one user will be able to manage a personal account and trust or entity accounts connected to that Social Security number and email address. But one user will not be able to manage two personal accounts with a single ID.me account.

I decided to go ahead and complete the login process for my account with ID.me, to get an idea of the experience. As readers have noted, it was simple, pretty much matching the TreasuryDirect video. Here’s a visual look:

Click login on the main page.

Click Secure Sign In to go to this intermediary page:

And then …

Enter the email address connected to your ID.me account.

And then the password.

Select the multi-factor authentication method. This step seems a bit odd to me, because a text message with “fair security” is offered as an option. But at least for me, using a desktop computer, the text message was the only option. The passkey option required — possibly — a fingerprint, which can’t be done on my computer.

I have used this process before for the IRS and have always used the text-message option. Just make sure to have your phone nearby.

Confirm the “text me” and check that the phone number digits match your device. I have hidden the numbers in this example.

Check your phone for the text message and enter it on this screen.

Authorize this information to be shared with TreasuryDirect. I believe that TD already has all this information, but the info is likely needed to confirm your login identity matches your account.

Confirm that TreasuryDirect can keep this information (which it already had) that was shared by the third-party provider (ID.me).

Select the account you want to access. In my case, the only option was my personal account. (My wife will need to log in separately for her account.) A person with both a personal and trust or entity accounts should see those options listed. You can log into one account at a time.

Conclusion

If you have a working ID.me account, linking it to your personal TreasuryDirect account is a simple process. That’s my experience. And I am going to give TreasuryDirect and ID.me credit for apparently working through most of the speed bumps, despite a very short launch path. (All logins will switch to ID.me on Oct. 28.)

But there many, many potential complexities. Please talk about your success and/or failures in the comments section.

Also see:

—————————

Donate? This site is free and I hope to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I welcome donations, any amount. And FYI, ads on this site pay for about one visit to Costco.

PayPal link / Venmo link

—————————

Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in I Bond, Savings Bond, Social Security, TreasuryDirect | Tagged , , | 57 Comments