iShares target-date TIPS ETFs are growing in appeal … and deserve a look

The newest fund, IBIM, holds just one TIPS, but will expand. I have cautions.

AI image for “money slipping away.” Perchance.org

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

Blackrock’s iShares division in March launched a unique ETF holding just one bond: CUSIP 91282CPU9, a 10-year TIPS that matures in January 2036.

The formal name is the “iShares iBonds Oct 2036 Term TIPS ETF,” with the ticker IBIM. The goal: To track the performance of U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities maturing in 2036. Later this year IBIM will add a second TIPS, to be issued in July, and then add two more 5-year TIPS to be issued in April and October 2031.

This is the 11th currently existing ETF of this type, holding TIPS maturing in a certain year. Others, such as IBIA and IBIB, have now matured. I have been following these funds for several years, and as time passes, I am easing off my initial qualms: Too weird and too small to be successful.

I had questions: Who is the target market for an ETF that will be holding only two to six bonds until maturity? Why not just buy and hold the individual TIPS? Would these ETFs provide tax-reporting benefits in a taxable account? Are these ETFs targeted at customers of assets-under-management financial advisers (which would possibly increase the cost to investors)?

The iShares suite of defined-maturity TIPS funds currently offers maturities for 2026 to 2036. Ideally, you buy the ETF — intending to hold to maturity — and then after a defined period, it distributes all proceeds and closes down. You can download the prospectus for the new 2036 fund here and the fact sheet here.

iShares has said these ETFs are designed to “mature like a bond, trade like a stock.” These are useful ETFs, I think, especially for an investor looking to quickly build a diversified TIPS ladder out to 2036. These funds should closely track the performance of the underlying TIPS. Here is a comparison of data for each ETF, along with VTIP, Vanguard’s Short-Term TIPS fund, for comparison:

The expense ratios for the iShares ETFs are only 0.10%, higher than VTIP’s 0.03% but quite good for such small funds.

Analysis

These funds are designed to be held to maturity and the asset value will rise and fall with market trends through maturity, just like any other bond fund.

Because the expense ratio is just 0.10%, I really have no problem with using these funds as an alternative to buying individual TIPS. You could quickly build a ladder through 2036 in 15 to 30 minutes.

However, the limited span of maturities means these ETFs aren’t the total solution for building an inflation-protected ladder of investments to cover 20 to 30 years. I raised this point in an April interview with Jason Zweig of the Wall Street Journal. He wrote:

You could use them as a “bridge” to Social Security if you’ll be retiring within 10 years, says David Enna, editor of Tipswatch.com. They aren’t yet a complete solution if you want to protect your purchasing power for, say, the next 30 years.

The size and trading volumes of these funds have increased nicely over the last two years, but still remain small compared to VTIP, an ETF giant. I suspect the ETFs are attracting many investors working with financial advisers. TIPS are complicated, and these funds are much easier to grasp.

The ETF trades as stock, so there is no minimum investment required. The cost of one share of IBIM was $25.13 at the close on Thursday. However, investors could face some bid-ask issues for very large orders. (Note: For a buy order, make sure to place a limit order because of the low volume for these funds.)

Income and inflation accrual distributions

One of the advantages of owning a TIPS to maturity is that inflation accruals continue to build over time, increasing the amount of principal and also increasing the semi-annual coupon payment as the principal increases. An individual TIPS gets the benefit of compounding, even though the coupon is distributed twice a year.

But one of the disadvantages of a TIPS is that if held in a taxable account, those inflation accruals are subject to “phantom” federal income taxes in the current year, even though they are not paid out. Plus, if your account is at TreasuryDirect, you will face the “dreaded 1099-OID,” the cryptic form reporting your taxable accruals.

The ETF plus. These defined-maturity ETFs “fix” the OID issue because inflation accruals will be paid out in the current year, along with the coupon interest. (This is the same way traditional TIPS funds work). That distribution makes these iShares TIPS ETFs more attractive for holding in a taxable account, because it eliminates the phantom income problem.

I assume this also means your broker will provide a single 1099-DIV tax form covering both coupon payments and inflation accruals.

The ETF minus. Distributing the inflation accruals in the current year means that at maturity you will be receiving only the original par value and final coupon payment, since all the inflation accruals would have been distributed. Zweig noted this in his April article:

Like all TIPS mutual funds or ETFs, the iShares funds pay out the inflation adjustment as current income each year. With individual TIPS, the inflation adjustment builds over time as an increase in principal value that isn’t realized until maturity or sale. In either case, the adjustment is taxable outside a retirement account.

In essence, this means if you buy IBIM at around $25 a share this week, in 2036 you are going to get back about $25 at maturity, but you will have earned inflation accruals and coupon payments along the way.

To get the full benefits of compounding and true inflation protection you would need to reinvest all inflation-accrual distributions back into these TIPS ETFs or another similar product. That could be a problem because of the low trading volume. I don’t own these ETFs, but it appears that Fidelity and Schwab do allow reinvestments, and Vanguard … might.

I have gotten feedback from readers saying they have been able to reinvest the dividends in these low-volume funds. Beyond the cost of any bid-ask spread, that is great news. If anyone has further experience with buying these funds and/or reinvesting the dividends, please provide the information in the comments section.

Do you need cash flow? To recap, these ETFs offer a cash-flow solution if held in a taxable account, with coupon interest and inflation accruals being paid out (and taxable) each year. If you don’t need the cash flow and are going to reinvest the dividends, they would work better in a tax-deferred account.

Thoughts

I buy individual TIPS with the intention of holding to maturity, so I already own CUSIP 91282CPU9 maturing in January 2036. But I can see the appeal for investors looking for a simpler way to invest in TIPS, especially in a taxable account.

The expense ratio of 0.10% is very good, especially if you can make your trades commission-free. But I do warn against using these ETFs in an assets-under-management account, which could wipe out 1% or more of your annual earnings. And in fact, I suspect these ETFs may have been designed for AUM financial advisers who really don’t understand TIPS (a lot of them don’t).

In summary, these target-maturity ETFs are a good investment for cash flow, would work well in a taxable account, and I really have no problem with them.

A new PIMCO ETF

On April 6, the investment firm PIMCO launched a new-fangled inflation-tracking ETF dubbed PIMCO Inflation PLUS Active ETF (PCPI). The press release says:

PCPI aims to provide investors who are concerned about rising inflation with a more direct hedge, lower volatility and limited interest rate risk versus traditional Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, known as TIPS.

PCPI is designed to limit interest rate risk and add incremental return potential through active management. It seeks real returns by investing primarily in short-term TIPS and other inflation-linked securities, and by actively managing the portfolio as market and inflation conditions change.

Sigh. This new fund might be fine, but I grit my teeth at the term “active management.” We are talking about, at most, seven TIPS and Treasury holdings? The expense ratio is 0.25%, which is eight times higher than VTIP’s 0.03%. The duration is defined as “ultra low” at 0.5 years, versus 2.5 for VTIP.

This ETF has very little trading history and I really don’t understand the premise. When a company uses the term PLUS in the ETF name in capital letters, there is something going on. Here is the prospectus if you want to dive in.

The ETF’s assets currently total $55 million, versus $6.8 billion for VTIP. This ETF is too new to draw any conclusions, but I would definitely shy away from any fund this new, this small, and this unproven.

The IVOL lesson

Back in the fall of 2020, when I was still writing for SeekingAlpha, I was getting a lot of questions about a new ETF with a tongue-twisting title: the Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility and Inflation Hedge ETF. Its ticker: IVOL.

The ETF’s creator, Nancy Davis of Quadratic Capital, was hailed as an innovator for this fund. Barron’s named her one of its top 200 Women in Finance in March 2020. But for me, IVOL was never particularly attractive. It was very new, with just a year of trading history. It was a fixed-income fund with a 1% expense ratio and a complex hedging strategy I couldn’t understand.

IVOL was investing 85% of its assets in SCHP, Schwab’s U.S. TIPS ETF, my favorite full-maturity-spectrum TIPS fund. On top of that, it was overlaying hedging strategies that sought to benefit from interest rate volatility. (Sound the alarms.)

IVOL had a sensational year in 2020, with a total return of 14.6% versus SCHP’s 10.9%. Readers began telling me: “This strategy works!” But In 2021, as both short- and long-term interest rates stabilized at very low levels, IVOL under-performed its two TIPS fund competitors by a wide margin.

Here are the total return results for IVOL over the last 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year periods:

Instead of looking for “new-fangled” solutions, an investor could have done much better by investing in tried and true TIPS ETFs like VTIP and SCHP. IVOL has grossly under-performing one hugely important metric: U.S. inflation.

Conclusion

Beware of the “new thing.” I don’t think the newly launched PIMCO fund is trying to push the envelope, so it may actually do fine investing in very short-term TIPS. If it is successful, let’s hope the 0.25% expense ratio begins to decline.

On the other hand, the iShares target-date TIPS ETFs have earned a look for investors who need a simplified way to buy TIPS.

Now is an ideal time to build a TIPS ladder

Confused by TIPS? Read my Q&A on TIPS

TIPS in depth: Understand the language

TIPS on the secondary market: Things to consider

TIPS investor: Don’t over-think the threat of deflation

Upcoming schedule of TIPS auctions

—————————

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is tips4-xmas-1.jpg

Donate? This site is free and I hope to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I welcome donations, any amount. And FYI, ads on this site pay for about one visit to Costco.

PayPal link / Venmo link

—————————

Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in ETFs, Investing in TIPS, Retirement | Tagged , , , , | 21 Comments

10-year TIPS auction gets real yield of 2.169% to soft demand

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

The Treasury’s offering of $19 billion in a reopening auction of a 10-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Security — CUSIP 91282CPU9 — generated a real yield to maturity of 2.169%, a bit above secondary market trading.

This is a 9-year, 8-month TIPS with a coupon rate of 1.875%, set at the originating auction on Jan. 22. It had been trading on the secondary market Thursday morning with a real yield to maturity of about 2.14%, and the “when issued” bond-market prediction was 2.15%. This indicates demand was a bit weak for this offering, even though the bid-to-cover ratio was a reasonable 2.52.

Definition: The “real yield to maturity” of a TIPS is its yield above future U.S. inflation, over the term of the TIPS. So a real yield of 2.169% means an investment in this TIPS would provide a return that exceeds official U.S. inflation by 2.169% for 9 years, 8 months.

Most likely, the real yield rose a bit higher because of market jitters over the U.S. stalemate with Iran, which has sent oil prices soaring. Iran reportedly is in talks on setting up a permanent toll for ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, a position the U.S. opposes.

The result was a good one for investors. The real yield of 2.169% was near the top of the range for auctions since mid 2022, when real yields rose out of negative depths. At its originating auction in January, this TIPS got a real yield of 1.940%.

Here is the trend in the 10-year real yield over the last two years. While real yields have now climbed above 2.0%, they remain below highs of early 2025:

Click on image for larger version.

Pricing

Because the real yield came in well above the coupon rate of 1.875%, this TIPS auctioned at a discount, with an unadjusted price of 97.455252. It will also carry an inflation index of 1.01522 on the settlement date of May 29. With that information, we can calculate the cost of a $10,000 par value purchase at this auction:

  • Par value: $10,000.
  • Principal purchased on settlement date: $10,000 x 1.01522 = $10,152.20.
  • Cost of investment: $10,152.20 x 0.97455252 = $9,893.85.
  • + accrued interest of $70.46.

In summary, an investor paid $9,893.85 for $10,152.20 of principal on the settlement date of May 29. From then on, the investor will earn accruals matching future inflation, plus an annual coupon rate of 1.875% on adjusted principal. The accrued interest will be returned at the first coupon payment on July 15.

Inflation breakeven rate

At the auction’s close, the 10-year Treasury note was trading with a nominal yield of 4.60%. That creates an inflation breakeven rate of 2.43% for this TIPS, the highest number since a similar auction in September 2022. A high inflation breakeven rate indicates a TIPS is “expensive” versus the nominal Treasury of the same term.

Investors were betting that U.S. inflation will exceed 2.43% over the next 9 years, 8 months. Over the last 10 years, inflation has averaged 3.4%.

Here is the trend in the 10-year inflation breakeven rate over the last two years, showing the recent surge higher in inflation expectations:

Click on image for larger version.

Thoughts

This was a good result for investors, with the real yield rising well above the most recent reopening of this term, 1.896% on March 19. But the fact that investor demand was lukewarm indicates the market fears higher real yields in the future.

Nevertheless, for an investor committed to holding to maturity, a real yield of 2.169% is attractive.

Interesting side note: Because non-seasonally-adjusted inflation surged 0.85% in April, holders of this TIPS will get a 0.85% boost to principal in June. The same goes for all TIPS, no matter when they were issued.

Here is the history over the last five years for TIPS auctions of this term. We’ve come a long way from the deeply negative real yields continuing through March 2022:

Confused by TIPS? Read my Q&A on TIPS

TIPS in depth: Understand the language

TIPS on the secondary market: Things to consider

TIPS investor: Don’t over-think the threat of deflation

Upcoming schedule of TIPS auctions

—————————

Donate? This site is free and I hope to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I welcome donations, any amount. And FYI, ads on this site pay for about one visit to Costco.

PayPal link / Venmo link

—————————

Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Federal Reserve, Inflation, Investing in TIPS, TreasuryDirect | Tagged , , | 16 Comments

This week’s 10-year TIPS auction is going to get interesting

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

As U.S. annual inflation rises toward 4%, investor interest in inflation-protected investments is also on the rise, making this week’s reopening auction of a 10-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Security one to watch.

This is CUSIP 91282CPU9, with a term of 9 years, 8 months. It had its originating auction on Jan. 22, when it got a real yield to maturity of 1.949% and a coupon rate of 1.875%. The first reopening auction, on March 19, got a real yield of 1.896%. There is a good possibility this week’s auction will top those yields.

This TIPS trades on the secondary market, and it closed Friday with a real yield to maturity of 2.07%, a jump of about 14 basis points from a week earlier. The U.S. Treasury market is now adjusting to a future with: 1) a lengthy period of high energy prices, 2) the potential for months of climbing U.S. inflation, 3) a growing possibility of Federal Reserve rate increases, and 4) a continual rise in U.S. budget deficits.

Definition: The “real yield to maturity” of a TIPS is its yield above future U.S. inflation, over the term of the TIPS. So a real yield of 2.07% means an investment in this TIPS would provide a return that exceeds official U.S. inflation by 2.07% for 9 years, 8 months.

Many investors assume that when inflation expectations rise, real yields will soar higher. But that is not exactly the case. In a period of rising inflation expectations, the nominal Treasury yield will rise faster than the TIPS yield. Since the beginning of the war with Iran:

  • The nominal yield of a 10-year Treasury note has increased 62 basis points.
  • The real yield of a 10-year TIPS has increased 38 basis points.
  • The inflation breakeven rate has increased 24 basis points.

At this point, I’d say it’s impossible to predict where the auction’s real yield will fall, but it looks likely to break through the 2.0% barrier for the first time in a year. Here is the trend in the 10-year real yield over the last 20 years and across two recessions:

Click on image for larger version.

The 20-year view is interesting because it reaches back before the period of Federal Reserve activism to force interest rates lower. Before the Great Recession of late 2007 to mid 2009, the 10-year real yield was solidly above 2.0%. In July 2007, a 10-year TIPS auctioned with a real yield of 2.749%. At the time, the 10-year Treasury note was yielding 5.11%, creating an inflation breakeven rate of 2.36%, lower than we are seeing today.

I don’t think we will see a repeat of 2007, but isn’t it possible that the 10-year nominal will rise to 5% and the 10-year TIPS to as high as 2.5%? Maybe, but not at this auction.

Pricing

Because the auctioned real yield is likely to be above the coupon rate of 1.875%, CUSIP 91282CPU9 will almost certainly get a discount on its unadjusted price. (It is currently trading with a price of 98.30.) However, it will carry a fairly sizable inflation index of 1.01522 on the settlement date of May 29. If the real yield holds at the current 2.07% (not likely), this is what the investment cost will look like for a $10,000 par value purchase:

  • Par value: $10,000
  • Principal purchased on settlement date: $10,000 x 1.01522 = $10,152.20
  • Cost of investment = $10,152.20 x 0.9830 = $9,979.61
  • + accrued interest of about $70.46.

Again, this is a forecast based on the Friday close. The market will change before Thursday’s auction, but it looks highly like that the cost will remain below par value, even with the extra accrued principal. The accrued interest will be returned at the first coupon payment on July 15.

Inflation breakeven rate

The 10-year Treasury note closed Friday with a nominal yield of 4.59%, which creates an inflation breakeven rate of 2.52% for this TIPS at its current real yield of 2.07% on the secondary market. If that breakeven rate holds, it would be the highest since an auction in May 2022 at 2.61%.

A high inflation breakeven rate indicates a TIPS is more “expensive” versus a Treasury of the same term. At some point, you might shift your focus to the nominal Treasury. Think inflation will average less than 2.52% over the next 10 years? Buy the Treasury note. (FYI, inflation over the last 10 years has averaged 3.4%.)

Here is the trend in the 10-year inflation breakeven rate over the last 20 years:

Note the wild dips lower during times of recession. Since early 2022, however, inflation expectations have hovered in a range of 2.2% to 2.5%. We are now at the high end of that range — thanks to a lingering oil-price shock.

Thoughts

I won’t be a buyer at this auction since I bought my full TIPS-ladder allocation for 2036 at the January auction.

There is no overriding reason to wait until the auction to purchase this TIPS, which will be trading on the secondary market all week. If you see a real yield that you like, buy it in a brokerage account.

The advantage of buying at auction, especially through TreasuryDirect, is that even small-lot purchases will get the auction’s high yield. The advantage of the secondary market is that you can see exactly the price and real yield you will be receiving. The negative is that you may face a small bid-ask spread. Most of the time, it doesn’t make a huge difference, but if you see a real yield you like, know that you can probably get it on the secondary market without dealing with the auction’s uncertainty.

This TIPS auction closes Thursday at 1 p.m. ET. Non-competitive bids at TreasuryDirect must be placed by noon Thursday. If you are putting an order in through a brokerage, make sure to place your order Wednesday or very early Thursday, because brokers cut off auction orders before the noon deadline.

I will be posting the auction results soon after the close on Thursday. Here is a history of auction results for this term over the last 5 years:

Confused by TIPS? Read my Q&A on TIPS

TIPS in depth: Understand the language

TIPS on the secondary market: Things to consider

TIPS investor: Don’t over-think the threat of deflation

Upcoming schedule of TIPS auctions

—————————

Donate? This site is free and I hope to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I welcome donations, any amount. And FYI, ads on this site pay for about one visit to Costco.

PayPal link / Venmo link

—————————

Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Federal Reserve, Inflation, Investing in TIPS, TreasuryDirect | Tagged , , | 29 Comments

Energy shock sends U.S. inflation to a three-year high

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

The lingering war in the Mideast, and its oil-price shock, sent U.S. seasonally-adjusted inflation 0.6% higher in April and pushed the annual rate to 3.8%, its highest level since May 2023, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.

Core inflation rose 0.4% for the month and 2.8% for the year — both numbers higher than expectations.

Economists expected an ugly report for April, but this was a bit uglier than forecast. Gasoline costs were a key factor, of course, rising 5.4% in the month after soaring 21.2% in March. Gas prices are now up 28.4% over the last year. The BLS said energy costs accounted for 40% of the all-items increase.

Shelter costs rose 0.6% for the month, a high number that was boosted by April survey data replacing missing data for October 2025. For October, when no data were collected, BLS set shelter inflation at 0.0%, obviously too low. This report begins to bring annual inflation back into line. Did shelter costs truly rise 0.6%? Probably not.

Also in the report:

  • Food at home costs increased a disturbing 0.7% in April, after falling 0.2% in March. The annual rate is now 2.9%.
  • Costs of fruits and vegetables were up 1.8% for the month and 6.1% for the year.
  • Beef prices rose 2.7% for the month.
  • Apparel costs rose 0.6% for the month and 4.2% for the year.
  • Airline fares were up 2.8% for the month and are now up 20.7% for the year.
  • Costs of new vehicles fell 0.2% for the month and are up only 0.2% for the year.
  • Costs of used cars and trucks were flat for the month.
  • Costs of medical care services were flat but up 3.2% for the year.

Although gasoline and shelter dominated this April report, there were many signs of inflation creeping across the economy — food, airline fares, household furnishings, apparel, etc. The result is this very scary chart:

Wednesday update: Producer prices

From Reuters: U.S. producer prices increased more than expected in April, posting their biggest gain since early 2022. The Producer Price ‌Index for final demand surged 1.4% last month after an upwardly revised 0.7% advance in ​March. In the 12 ​months through ​April, the PPI jumped 6.0%. That was ​the largest increase since December 2022.

What this means for TIPS and I Bonds

Investors in Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities and Series I Savings Bonds are also interested in non-seasonally adjusted inflation, which is used to adjust principal balances for TIPS and set future interest rates for I Bonds. For April, the BLS set the inflation index at 333.020, an increase of 0.85% over the March number.

For TIPS. The April report means that principal balances for all TIPS will rise 0.85% in June after rising 1.05% in March. These are gaudy numbers, but will be balanced off later in the year when non-seasonally-adjusted inflation runs lower than the seasonally-adjusted version. Here are the new June Inflation Indexes for all TIPS.

For I Bonds. April is the first of a six-month string that will determine the I Bond’s new variable rate, which will be reset November 1. We can’t draw any conclusions from this one-month 0.85% increase, but I can say it is the highest April number over the last 14 years I have been tracking this data.

View historical data on my Inflation and I Bonds page.

What this means for future interest rates

We can be certain the Federal Reserve, even under Kevin Warsh’s new leadership, will not be cutting short-term interest rates until this energy shock settles down and we can see the lasting results.

With inflation surging, should the Fed be raising interest rates? Also not likely, especially if the U.S. economy begins slowing down under the weight of energy costs. So I am thinking we are in a period of uneasy stability for short-term rates.

From today’s Bloomberg report:

Even if the current ceasefire holds and the Strait of Hormuz reopens soon, economists anticipate higher costs are likely to persist in the months ahead as oil output normalizes and shipping flows recover. …

The FOMC is likely to be concerned by renewed signs of food inflation accelerating, given the risk that higher gasoline and food prices together will further boost households’ inflation expectations.

And the Wall Street Journal:

The April report is the latest sign that the rate cuts that markets were pricing in at the start of the year are no longer a 2026 story. … Now, the policy debate within the Fed has shifted away from when to cut rates and toward when to start signaling that a rate hike is as likely as a rate cut.

It’s possible we could see inflation begin to stabilize in coming months, while remaining in a range around 4.0%. That is not the set-up for cuts in interest rates. And once again, we can see the value in investing in inflation protection.

—————————

Donate? This site is free and I plan to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I welcome donations, any amount. And FYI, ads on this site pay for about one visit to Costco.

PayPal link / Venmo link

—————————

Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Federal Reserve, I Bond, Inflation, Investing in TIPS | Tagged , , , | 41 Comments

I filled out the top end of my TIPS ladder last week

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

One morning last week on Bloomberg, a fixed-income analyst was asked about the effect of a 5% nominal yield on a 30-year Treasury bond. He said: “Then you’ll see bond investors attacking like seagulls in Finding Nemo.” (See Nemo video)

I must have seagull instincts. A 30-year nominal cracking 5% doesn’t particularly interest me, but I was curious about real yields for the top end of my ladder of Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, years 2040 to 2043.

So I flocked in. When I built this ladder, mostly in late summer/fall of 2023, I didn’t quite fill out the years 2041 to 2043, mainly because of very high existing inflation accruals on those TIPS, which means buying a lot of additional principal.

In mid-April and then last week, I completed the top end. I thought it would be helpful for me to explain how each transaction worked.

April 14: CUSIP 912810QP6

This TIPS matures Feb. 15, 2041. I own one portion at TreasuryDirect (bought at the original 2011 auction with a real yield of 2.190%) and another portion in a traditional IRA, bought in fall 2023 with real yields of around 2.20%.

  • Par value: $7,000
  • Coupon rate: 2.125%
  • Inflation factor: 1.4885
  • Adjusted principal: $10,419.50
  • Price: 98.27343
  • Cost of investment: $10,239.60
  • Real yield to maturity: 2.263%

For this purchase, I was looking to add $10,000 to 2041’s accrued principal, bringing it to my target level for each year of the ladder. Because of the large inflation accrual, I placed a par-value order for $7,000 to get the result of $10,419.50 in adjusted principal, at a cost of $10,239.60.

I like this TIPS, which I will hold to maturity, because I appreciate having a 2.125% coupon rate creating cash flow through the next 15 years. The next two TIPS don’t have that same coupon-rate advantage, however.

May 5: CUSIP 912810QV3

This TIPS matures Feb. 15, 2042.

  • Par value: $8,000
  • Coupon rate: 0.750%
  • Inflation factor: 1.448665
  • Adjusted principal: $11,589.20
  • Price: 77.57812
  • Cost of investment: $8,990.68
  • Real yield to maturity: 2.475%

I spent $8,990.68 to add $11,589.20 in principal, bringing the total to my goal. The yearly cash flow isn’t great at 0.750%, but this is the way it works — there is only one TIPS maturing in 2042. This is the only option. The real yield to maturity of 2.475% was well above my original 2023 purchase at 2.105%.

May 5: CUSIP 912810RA8

This TIPS matures Feb. 15, 2043.

  • Par value: $10,000
  • Coupon rate: 0.625%
  • Inflation factor: 1.42376
  • Adjusted principal: $14,237.60
  • Price: 74.14843
  • Cost of investment: $10,556.96
  • Real yield to maturity: 2.525%

This TIPS had the biggest gap to my yearly target amount, so I was looking to add $14,000 in principal, which required purchasing $10,000 par value at a cost of $10,556.96. The real yield of 2.525% was well above my 2023 purchase at 2.203%.

Deflation risk?

I get a lot of feedback from readers who are very resistant to purchasing inflation-adjusted principal above par value, even at a discount. The reason: A TIPS is guaranteed to return only par value at maturity, and that means any amount above par value is exposed to risk of deflation, meaning principal would decline.

Yes, it is a risk. But as I noted in this article, “Don’t over-think the potential threat of deflation,” the risk is much greater short-term than long-term.

Since 1971, the lowest average annual inflation for any 5-year period was 1.4%, for the 5 years ending in both 2017 and 2018. For 10-year periods, the lowest was 1.6%, for the years ending in 2017. For a 30-year period, the lowest was 2.2%, for the years ending in 2020.

So if you are buying a TIPS on the secondary market with a high inflation index and 15 years remaining to maturity, you can be fairly confident you won’t be struck by a 15-year period of deflation, eating away at your above-par investment.

Since 1971, there has not been a single deflationary year ending in December. The lowest inflation rate was 0.1% in 2008.

And keep in mind that every single TIPS you are holding at the moment has an inflation accrual above par value.

Sense of completion

These are fairly small investments, not life-changing in any way. The three purchases will allow me to focus on future purchases of TIPS maturing in 2037 to 2038.

Last week, I had an interesting question from a reader:

In deciding upon the ending year for your target range do you include additional years your beneficiary may hold the account after your own death? I am currently thinking for TIPS held in a Roth wrapper account that 10 years beyond my expected death would be a reasonable year to select and that a 10 year rolling TIPS ladder could be a great fit and allow the beneficiary to hold all the TIPS in the Roth account to maturity if they wish.

I can’t argue with that premise, as long as the beneficiary is a responsible person who could take directions and understand how TIPS work. My wife and I have no children, so beneficiaries aren’t a great concern.

Will I live to that last maturity in 2043, when I will be just months from 90? It’s certainly possible, but maybe not likely. I definitely think my wife could live to 90 and she has financial smarts. But around age 90, who wants to be managing a TIPS ladder?

Let’s face it: TIPS are a complex and intimidating investment. I was talking to a Wall Street Journal reporter a week ago who told me that a co-worker, very skilled at financial journalism, doesn’t get TIPS at all. We laughed. But that’s the norm. I hope this article provides helpful information on purchasing TIPS on the secondary market.

The complicated nature of TIPS is why a lot of sophisticated investors prefer I Bonds, despite the lower real yield. I Bonds have advantages of tax-deferral, rock-solid deflation protection, and a flexible maturity. They can never go down in value, unlike a TIPS. I Bonds and TIPS make a good combination.

Here is the Wall Street Journal video:

Now is an ideal time to build a TIPS ladder

Confused by TIPS? Read my Q&A on TIPS

TIPS in depth: Understand the language

TIPS on the secondary market: Things to consider

TIPS investor: Don’t over-think the threat of deflation

Upcoming schedule of TIPS auctions

—————————

Donate? This site is free and I plan to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I welcome donations, any amount. And FYI, ads on this site pay for about one visit to Costco.

PayPal link / Venmo link

—————————

Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Inflation, Investing in TIPS, Retirement, TreasuryDirect | Tagged , , | 30 Comments