Barrons columnist Randall Forsyth is writing this week about an intriguing – and somewhat scary – proposal: That the Federal Reserve is considering placing exit fees on bond mutual funds to prevent a potential run when interest rates rise. Here is his core paragraph:
(I)t might be well that the Federal Reserve appears to be thinking about the consequences of the end — and eventual reversal — of its massive experiment in monetary stimulation. Last week, the Financial Times reported that the central bank is mulling exit fees on bond mutual funds to prevent a potential run when interest rates rise, which, given the ineluctable mathematics of bond investing, means prices fall. Quoting “people familiar with the matter,” the FT said that senior-level discussions had taken place, but no formal policy had been developed.
Forsyth says that Fed Chair Janet Yellen, when asked last week about the possible move, answered that the matter “is under the purview” of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In other words, she didn’t deny it.
That was the first I heard of the proposal. Here’s a link to the Financial Times article: ‘Fed looks at exit fees on bond funds‘ and the core paragraphs:
Officials are concerned that bond funds are becoming “shadow banks”, because investors can withdraw their money on demand, even though the assets held by the funds can be hard to sell in a crisis. The Fed discussions have taken place at a senior level but have not yet developed into formal policy, according to people familiar with the matter. …
Exit fees would seek to discourage retail investors from withdrawing funds, thereby making their claims less liquid and making a fire sale of the assets more unlikely.
The idea of exit fees wouldn’t be popular with investors, who likely would be trying to sell bond funds during an already sharp fall. The exit fee would increase their losses. I haven’t seen any indication how large a fee is being considered.
Interest rates are likely to rise over the next two years. And if bond yields rise, and prices fall, bond-fund holders will benefit from the higher yields, eventually regaining the lost asset value. A sharp decline in bond prices could actually create a buying opportunity, just as many people are selling out.
But an ‘exit fee’ proposal seems to indicate the Fed and SEC are worried about a market reaction to higher interest rates and the potential of a ‘crash’ in the bond market. And that worries me.
Are their any such exit fees existing in the world already? Where, and how big?
I know that Vanguard used to have a ‘redemption’ fees on some funds, only applied if a fund was sold within a certain time period, such as 90 or 180 days. This was designed to discourage frequent trading. The fee was pretty small, like 0.25%. More info:
http://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Redemption_fee
On the other hand, those who purchase individual bonds like to pretend that when interest rates rise they aren’t sustaining any sort of loss. That is they don’t mark their bonds to market in a rising rate environment in the hopes they will hold them to maturity. If the bonds are inflation-indexed this may have some credibility since inflation is (supposedly) covered. Anyone ever tried transferring a bond from Treasury Direct to a brokerage account to sell same? Ugh! In any event some increase in rates may already be priced into bond prices now, in anticipation of rising rates.
For myself, I would no more attempt to predict future interest rates than I would future stock market prices. I’ve known people who stayed short for years anticipating higher interest rates and only fooled themselves. The Fed! I remember when the story was communism would never work because of over-management, And what do we have now???
Len, I would say that your “Ugh!” overstates the burden of filling out a form, and mailing it — see here:
https://www.treasurydirect.gov/indiv/research/indepth/tips/res_tips_sell.htm
Given that I had to “beat” the required information out of Vanguard’s brokerage desk to fill out the form first, and then piddle away some time getting the one officer at the local bank entrusted with the signature guarantee medallion I think “Ugh!” is pretty mild. I’m trying to keep this family friendly.
Len, I offer this as a relevant point. Given that the “system” does this to the people
The Public Be Suckered
http://patrick.net/forum/?p=1230886
I suppose that the “system” prefers to deter do-it-yourself thinking.
Well Treasury used to have a “Sell Direct” program but apparently that was too convenient for us suckers. Some folks like to do tax-loss selling on longer maturities and let Uncle Sam share the pain. The Public Be Suckered? How true Ed how true, and thanks for the link!
Hi Len,
You are most welcome. I have tried hard to inform people of these compelling histories, with little effect:
… these massive deceptions by omission, which do great harm in our democracy.
Intro
http://www.showrealhist.com/yTRIAL.html
The Public Be Suckered
http://patrick.net/forum/?p=1230886
In case you have any good ideas …, be glad to hear!
This is a tentative change …
Len, I am one of those ‘dolts’ who buys TIPS, holds them to maturity, and never marks them to market. The only thing I track is current accrued principal, and I have never sold a TIPS before maturity and never will. (I have some EE Bonds paying 5% that I will probably sell before maturity, but that’s another topic.)
I agree that it is impossible to predict interest rates but I do believe that today’s ultra-low rates are an outlier that can’t continue. Eventually we will return to the norm, and possibly much higher. Same with inflation. It has been very low, but eventually back to the norm, and possibly much higher.
The stock market has had a very nice run for nearly six years. Back to the norm? And possibly much lower?
Well if (as you obviously do) understand the math then you aren’t a dolt. Nor are you deluded into thinking that your investment is stable when in fact it fluctuates with interest rates until final maturity.
As for the rest…. we can’t predict, but we are below the norm (average?). Every year, more or less, the average changes with the addition of another year’s data to the data set. There may be some folks in Japan still waiting for a return to the norm and its been 25 years now. IF I knew I’d have bought that island by now….