By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

Before a shooting war broke out in the Mideast, the big topic of discussion in finance was an artificial intelligence doomsday scenario published Feb. 22 by Citrini Research with the title “The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis.”

The hypothetical article (7,000 words!) began with a preface asking, “What if our AI bullishness continues to be right … and what if that’s actually bearish?” It was presented as a macro memo from the future — June 2028 — as the U.S. unemployment rate hit 10.2% and the S&P 500 continued falling, now down 38% from its October 2026 highs.

AI capabilities improved, companies needed fewer workers, white collar layoffs increased, displaced workers spent less, margin pressure pushed firms to invest more in AI, AI capabilities improved… It was a negative feedback loop with no natural brake. The human intelligence displacement spiral.

The Citrini article went viral, reaching more than 30 million readers and sparking intense investor anxiety. The S&P 500 fell 1.7% a day later as investors began shucking AI-vulnerable software stocks in reaction.

James Van Geelen, founder of Citrini Research and co-author of the article, has stressed that the piece was meant to present a possibility, not a prediction. He was interviewed in-depth on the OddLots podcast last week. Listen to that here:

Can I be replaced?

I will admit to using ChatGPT and other AI sources to research many personal topics, such as “Is sauerkraut considered a healthy food”? Answer: Yes, except watch out for the sodium. I also use AI frequently to create images for this website. But I never use AI as a source of information on Series I Savings Bonds or Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities.

So that leads to the question. Could this site, Tipswatch.com, be managed and written by AI agents instead of by me? I asked ChatGPT, and this is what I got:

Query: Could the website Tipswatch.com be staffed totally by AI agents with little or no human intervention?

No — Tipswatch.com is very unlikely to be completely staffed or run by AI agents with no human involvement. Here’s why:

✅ 1. Real human author is publicly credited

The website itself clearly states that it’s written by a real person: David Enna, a long-time financial journalist based in Charlotte, North Carolina, who has been writing the site for years and has a full “About Me” page describing his background and experience.

✅ 2. Articles carry a human byline

Recent posts on the site are credited to David Enna with “By David Enna, Tipswatch.com,” indicating human authorship rather than generic AI authors.

❓ 3. AI tools could be used — but not to fully replace humans

Like many blogs and publishers, Tipswatch.com might use modern tools — such as grammar editing, research assistants, or AI image generation for visuals — to speed up parts of the workflow. That’s common in independent publishing. But the byline, editorial judgment, and financial commentary rest on a named human writer, not anonymous bots.

Why people sometimes ask about AI staffing

There are low-quality or purported “AI-generated” sites online that publish content with little or no human oversight — sometimes without even real author names or verifiable identities. Industry tracking projects have found thousands of such sites producing content primarily with generative AI and minimal human editing. However, Tipswatch.com is not one of those; it attributes its content to a known journalist with a documented track record.

In short: While any modern site might use AI tools in the background (for editing, formatting, or assistance), Tipswatch.com is written and maintained by a real human author (David Enna), not exclusively by AI agents with little or no human intervention.

Reaction

Well, that’s nice. ChatGPT recognizes that I am human and my so-called job appears to be safe for the time being. Human beings remain important, at least in some cases.

A test posting

Next up, I launched a fresh search and asked ChatGPT to write an article on the recent auction of a 30-year TIPS. You can read my version here, but I gave ChatGPT no prompt or link to that article or this site. Here is the result:

Query: Write an analysis of the auction on Feb. 19, 2026, of a 30-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Security. What was the real yield and auction implications?

Here’s a clear analysis of the U.S. Treasury’s Feb. 19, 2026 auction of the 30-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) — including the real yield result and what it implies for investors and markets.

📊 Auction Results: Real Yield and Demand

On February 19, 2026, the U.S. Treasury auctioned $9 billion of a new 30-year TIPS issue (CUSIP 912810US5). The key results were:

• Real yield to maturity: 2.473 % — meaning the yield above inflation that investors will earn if they hold the security to maturity. This is measured after adjusting for expected future U.S. inflation. ^{* Tipswatch.com}
• This real yield was the second-highest for a 30-year TIPS auction since the Treasury restarted the long maturity in 2010, indicating strong investor compensation for locking in long-dated, inflation-protected returns.^{* Tipswatch.com}
• The coupon rate was set at 2.375 %, slightly below the real yield, which resulted in the TIPS being sold at a discount price (~97.93) on issuance.^{* Tipswatch.com}
• Bid-to-cover ratio: about 2.75, a solid demand indicator showing healthy investor interest relative to the amount offered.^{* Tipswatch.com}

📈 What the Real Yield Means

📌 1. Inflation Protection and Expected Returns

A real yield of 2.473 % means that investors are being compensated nearly 2.5 % above inflation for lending money for 30 years. In inflation-protected securities, this is a premium over both expected inflation and the inflation risk that might materialize over three decades. ^{* Tipswatch.com}

In the context of recent history, this is attractive from a long-term perspective — many TIPS auctions have seen significantly lower real yields over past cycles, particularly when inflation expectations were more uncertain. ^{* Tipswatch.com}

📌 2. Break-Even and Nominal Comparisons

Using contemporaneous nominal Treasury yields (e.g., 30-year Treasury nominal yield ~4.70 % around the same time), the inflation breakeven rate implied by this TIPS auction was roughly 2.23 %. This reflects what the market expects average inflation to be over 30 years; if actual inflation averages above that, the TIPS will outperform a nominal Treasury of similar maturity. ^{* Tipswatch.com}

📌 3. Market and Auction Implications

Strong Demand Signals

• The bid-to-cover above historical norms suggests solid participation from investors, especially given that long-dated securities can sometimes struggle in weak markets. ^{* Tipswatch.com}

Treasury Financing Costs

• For the Treasury, a higher real yield means higher long-term borrowing costs in real terms, though the robust demand at auction mitigates any immediate worries about financing stress.

Yield Curve and Macroeconomic Interpretation

• Elevated real yields at the long end reflect market pricing of future inflation and interest-rate expectations, including a potentially higher neutral rate environment even as nominal yields and inflation expectations fluctuate. This hints that investors demand a meaningful real return to compensate for long-term risks. ^{* Tipswatch.com}
• In broader market context (beyond TIPS specifics), nominal Treasury yields were somewhat volatile in February, influenced by mixed inflation data and changing views on rate cuts or geopolitical risk. ^{*TradingEconomics.com *Linkedin.com}

📌 Investor Takeaways

• Long-Term View: This auction reaffirms that TIPS can offer compelling real returns compared with historical norms, especially for holders who plan to keep them to maturity. ^{* Tipswatch.com}
• Inflation Outlook: The implied inflation breakeven near ~2.2 % suggests that markets see long-run inflation close to Federal Reserve targets — not runaway inflation, but also not rapidly decelerating. ^{* Tipswatch.com}
• Volatility and Duration: Investors should still expect volatility, especially in the long end, since TIPS prices move with real rates and inflation expectations. ^{* Tipswatch.com}

Bottom Line

The Feb. 19, 2026 30-year TIPS auction delivered a strong real yield at 2.473 %, with robust participation and a discount price reflecting active demand. For long-term, inflation-protected investors, the result was generally positive, signaling continued confidence in the Treasury financing mechanism and market appetite for real returns amid evolving inflation and rate expectations. ^{* Tipswatch.com}

Conclusion: I can’t be replaced!

And in fact, ChatGPT viewed Tipswatch.com as the sole source for information on that Feb. 19 auction. It referenced only two other sources where authors discussed overall trends in the Treasury market, not the auction itself.

—————————

Donate? This site is free and I plan to keep it that way. Some readers have suggested having a way to contribute. I would welcome donations. Any amount, or skip it, your choice. This is completely optional.

PayPal link / Venmo link

—————————

Follow Tipswatch on X for updates on daily Treasury auctions and real yield trends (when I am not traveling).

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades. NOTE: Comment threads can only be three responses deep. If you see that you cannot respond, create a new comment and reference the topic.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.