Not negative: I Bond variable interest rate will reset to 0.16% on May 1

The U.S. inflation report for March had non-seasonally adjusted inflation rising 0.43%, enough to overwrite 5 months of deflation for the September 2015 to March 2016 adjustment period. Inflation ended up rising 0.08% in that six-month period, meaning  the Treasury will reset the I Bond’s variable rate to 0.16% on May 1.

That’s down from the current 1.54%, but it is good news for I Bond holders because a negative variable rate wipes out the fixed rate up to that amount. I’ve posted the new numbers on my ‘Tracking Inflation and I Bonds‘ page.

I’ve also posted a more in-depth analysis at SeekingAlpha.com.

Read my analysis at SeekingAlpha.com.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Investing in TIPS. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Not negative: I Bond variable interest rate will reset to 0.16% on May 1

  1. JJ says:

    So, given your understanding of what has and will happen, will you wait until November to buy your 2016 I bonds, or will you pull the trigger in May?

  2. JJ says:

    I see your answer came. Thanks.

  3. BigDaddyRich says:

    And as usual, the wild card is the fixed rate — which affects EE Bonds as well, which I would like to start buying when/if the rates begin to tick up.

  4. tipswatch says:

    I will probably write more on my thinking on the fixed rate before May 1. But right now I am just guessing the Treasury might hold the I Bond fixed at 0.1%, and for the EE Bonds, too. However, under ‘normal’ circumstances, with the 10-year TIPS at about .2%, there’s now way the Treasury would keep the fixed rate at 0.1%. It would go to 0.0%. The problem, though, is the very low variable rate.

  5. Len says:

    Just my usual comment I guess. I am sure somewhere in the USA there is someone whose experienced inflation rate is something near what the government puts out. Trouble is I have never met them it seems. So- there are plenty of other naysayers online with the figures to back up the contention that the CPI numbers are a fantasy. Leaving us with…………………..

    • Jimbo says:

      The non-seasonly adjusted CPI-U is just a weighted national average of prices in cities. The BLS breaks it down into “detailed expenditure catgeories” and their respective inflation rates. The category inflation rates look spot on to me. Most “inflation conspiracy theorists” have a problem with the weightings. The “thinking” goes along the following lines, “I don’t have a pet. So, the inclusion of pet food makes the CPI-U invalid.” There’s some strange stuff in there but it’s just a measure of the inflation rate for goods and services that everybody in the country uses, has used or will use at some point in their life. As such, it’s pretty indicative of the overall inflation rate in the country. As far as TIPS goes, you know what it’s based upon before you purchase them. So, if you don’t feel it’s accurate, don’t by TIPS. Basing Social Security benefits on it is a whole other matter. Social Security should have an inflation index that’s more representative of the actual expenditures of seniors. Obama and his Republican buddies wanted to do the opposite. Pelosi actually stated that it would “save” Social Security. Thanks goodness that whole “budget compromise” went down the tubes!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s