Video: An economist offers a common-sense look at U.S. inflation

‘We are, unfortunately, about to go through a period of prolonged, persistent high inflation.’

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

There’s a lot of speculation in financial markets right now about an upcoming dip in U.S. inflation, triggered by a strong decline in gasoline prices. We saw some of that effect in July with all-items inflation flat for the month, even though core inflation rose 0.3%. We could see a similar result in August inflation, to be released Sept. 13.

So yes, U.S. inflation is falling from its 9.1% annual peak in July, and will probably continue to gradually decline. But by how much, and how fast? How long will it take to get to the Federal Reserve’s target of 2% annual inflation?

Here’s a clearly explained outlook from Campbell Harvey, a Canadian economist who is professor of finance at Duke University and a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts. In the video, Harvey explains why statistical and structural evidence points to U.S. inflation remaining at an annual rate of of at least 6.2% by the end of the year, even if deflationary pressures continue for several months. A more realistic number might be above 7.0%, he suggests.

“It’s kind of obvious looking at the data, but a lot of people don’t pick it up, is that we’ve already had year to date … 6.3% inflation. So if you think that inflation is going to end the year at 2 or 3 percent, it means that we are going to have strong negative inflation. … And I think that is very unlikely.”

Harvey also points out important changes in the way inflation was calculated 40 years ago versus today. The key point is that changes in the shelter index (which is weighted to be about 32% of all-items inflation) were designed to smooth out volatility, and that means inflation is printing lower than reality. The result: “There is more to come. And it is because of this smoothing.”

“The point is, this inflation has already happened, but it is not reflected in the CPI. And it will be reflected in the next year, or maybe longer. So anybody who is telling the story ‘oh well, this is just supply chain or geopolitical risk and we’ll quickly be back down to 2, 3 percent’ … No. You have to look at the actual structure of how inflation is calculated.”

It’s an excellent video. Give it a watch.

* * *

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. The investments he discusses can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

About Tipswatch

Author of Tipswatch.com blog, David Enna is a long-time journalist based in Charlotte, N.C. A past winner of two Society of American Business Editors and Writers awards, he has written on real estate and home finance, and was a founding editor of The Charlotte Observer's website.
This entry was posted in Federal Reserve, Inflation. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Video: An economist offers a common-sense look at U.S. inflation

  1. Patrick says:

    The monthly CPI change is the most interesting for projecting future rates. And the monthly Core CPI change is even better. The annual data incorporates info we already know about.

  2. Mike H says:

    After listening to the video, I think I will buy/gift some more I-bonds.

  3. wally says:

    wow, excellent analysis that is actionable

  4. Hans Johnson says:

    Hi David – This is brilliant, thanks for sharing it. It is quite a contrast from what the Fed’s Neel Kashkari was saying on a recent episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

  5. E J says:

    Here he is in a more recent, longer, and scarier discussion:

  6. Jimbo says:

    I liked how Harvey showed that even if monthly inflation stayed at zero for the rest of the year, it wasn’t going to get anywhere near the FED’s stated goal of being between 2% and 3%. In fact, it would take sustained deflation for that to happen. That’s just simple grade school mathematics.

    His comments about shelter costs being a lagging component of inflation were interesting. Surveying rental units on a rolling 6 months schedule seems reasonable. He brought-up an excellent point in that it’s going to take a while for the measurement of inflation to reflect past reality.

    After sitting on the sidelines for the last few years because TIPS yields have been negative, I loaded-up on TIPS at the last two auctions. Since the June auction, the yield on the 5 year TIPS has doubled. If those yields hold for the October auction. I’ll be purchasing a lot more.

    If you look at the FRED yield chart, 5 year TIPS yields have only been marginally positive for short periods of time since the Great Recession. The 2% yields prior to the Great Recession seem to be a thing of the past. With ZIRP and QE gone, this year and next year may be a good buying opportunity.

  7. Herbert Schmitt says:

    Right on…see also
    https://johnhcochrane.blogspot.com/
    “Apartment inflation” which highlight the effect of “sticky prices”.

  8. David Zucker says:

    Doesn’t that imply that 5 year TIPs with a real yield of about 0.75% are a solid buy compared to nominal Treasurys?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s