I Bond’s fixed rate rises to 1.3%, highest in more than 16 years

Composite rate for I Bonds rises to 5.27%. Fixed rate for EE Bonds rises to 2.70%; doubling factor holds at 20 years.

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

The Treasury announced today it is raising the permanent fixed rate on the U.S. Series I Savings Bond to 1.3%, the highest fixed rate since a reset in May 2007.

Combined with a six-month inflation-adjusted variable rate of 3.94%, I Bonds sold from November 2023 to April 2024 will get a composite rate of 5.27%, Treasury said.

The I Bond’s fixed rate is important for investors. It is permanent and stays with an I Bond until redemption or maturity in 30 years. This new fixed rate only applies to I Bonds purchased from November 2023 to April 2024.

The variable rate applies to all I Bonds, no matter when they were issued. It changes every six months and the starting date of the change depends on the month you bought the I Bond. This new 3.94% variable rate is based on non-seasonally adjusted inflation from April to September 2023.

Here is how the Treasury calculated the new composite rate:

Source: TreasuryDirect

Note that the new composite rate of 5.27% applies only to I Bonds purchased from November 2023 to April 2024. If you are holding an older I Bond with a fixed rate of 0.0%, your new composite rate will be 3.94% for six months. If you bought an I Bond from May to October 2023, it has a fixed rate of 0.9% and the new composite rate will be 4.86% for six months.

Reaction

I my most recent projection I estimated that the I Bond’s fixed rate would be set in a range of 1.1% to 1.4%, so a fixed rate of 1.3% fits into expectations. It is not spectacular, especially when a comparable investment — the 5-year Treasury Inflation Protected Security — has a real yield of 2.40%, an advantage of 110 basis points.

Not spectacular, but satisfactory and hits a 16-year high. I Bonds are a simple investment to track, earn tax-deferred interest, and can never lose a cent of accumulated value. An I Bond with a fixed rate of 1.3% remains attractive and a worthy investment.

But how worthy? I already bought my $10,000 I Bond allocation this year, back in April when the composite rate was impressive (6.89%) but the fixed rate was what we know see as mediocre (0.4%). That I Bond will soon transition to a composite rate of 4.35%. Oh well. I will still hold that one.

I am not sure a fixed rate of 1.3% is attractive enough to do a “gift-box swap” in 2023, but I will consider it. More likely I will simply wait until mid-April 2024 to decide if the 1.3% fixed rate remains highly attractive. There is no penalty for waiting to buy this 1.3% I Bond. You can purchase any time from November to April and get the same return.

From an article today on Money.com:

What’s notable about the new I bonds rate is not the overall 5.27% yield but the fixed rate. The fixed rate hasn’t exceeded 1% since before the Great Recession ….

As an example of how critical the fixed rate is, look no further than the folks who bought lots of I bonds when the rate was an eye-popping 9.62% last May. The Treasury Department says it sold billions worth in the first week alone; in the last week the rate was applicable, the website had so many visitors it crashed.

While the inflation-based rate was extremely high, the fixed rate was 0%. Without a fixed rate boosting the yield, those same I bonds purchased in 2022 are now earning only 3.94% (the inflation-portion only) — versus the 5.27% rate for I bonds purchased starting in November.

Then the next question: Is a six-month composite rate of 5.27% attractive enough for short-term investors in I Bonds, looking to redeem in 12 to 18 months? I’d guess most short-term investors (I am not in the category) will pass and look to invest in shorter-term T-bills, with the 1-year currently yielding 5.41% and no penalty for redemption after one year.

Conclusion. For longer-term investors, I’d say this new I Bond with a 1.3% fixed rate is a solid investment, considering the benefits of tax-deferral, deflation protection and exemption from state income taxes. We’ve had a long wait for a super-safe return this attractive.

Rolling over 0.0% fixed rates?

If you are holding I Bonds with 0.0% fixed rate — especially those held for five years or more — you can consider redeeming those older I Bonds for new ones with the 1.3% fixed rate. When you redeem, you will owe federal taxes on the interest earned.

If you are planning to redeem I Bonds held for less than five years, read this first: “The I Bond exit ramp is now open; proceed with caution“.

I think this is a sound strategy, especially if you don’t want to raise another $20,000 to buy I Bonds this year or next in two separate accounts.

EE Bonds

And now for the disappointing news: The Treasury raised the permanent fixed rate of EE Savings Bonds to 2.7%, up only 20 basis points from the past rate of 2.5%. It is retaining the policy that EE Bonds will double in value if held for 20 years, guaranteeing a compounded return of about 3.53%.

I’m baffled. Back in May 2023, when the EE’s fixed rate was set at 2.5%, a 10-year Treasury note was yielding 3.44%. The current yield is 4.88%, 144 basis points higher. Raising the EE’s fixed rate to 2.7% is a weak move, and guaranteeing a return of 3.53% for holding 20 years is also inadequate. You can invest in a 20-year Treasury bond and get a return of 5.21%.

The doubling period should have been shortened to 16 years, at least, which would guarantee a return of about 4.5% if held for 16 years. Even that falls short of attractive. EE Bonds can now be placed on a shelf to collect dust. They aren’t a meaningful investment in November 2023.

What’s your reaction?

Investors are going to be sorting through a lot of issues when considering this new I Bond with a fixed rate of 1.3%. Is it a better investment than a 5- or 10-year TIPS held to maturity? Or is it an acceptable tax-deferred alternative? Is the 1.3% fixed rate attractive enough to trigger gift-box purchases for future distribution? Will you invest in January 2024 or hold off until mid-April when the next variable rate will be set?

Lots of things to consider. Post your ideas in the comments section below. To close, here is the history of all fixed rates for I Bonds back to their inception in September 1998:

Confused by I Bonds? Read my Q&A on I Bonds

Let’s ‘try’ to clarify how an I Bond’s interest is calculated

Inflation and I Bonds: Track the variable rate changes

I Bonds: Here’s a simple way to track current value

I Bond Manifesto: How this investment can work as an emergency fund

* * *

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Cash alternatives, EE Bonds, I Bond, Savings Bond, TreasuryDirect | 83 Comments

I Bond’s fixed rate: An updated projection

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

Back on Oct. 8 I posted an article, “The I Bond’s fixed rate will rise. But by how much?” attempting to forecast the potential new fixed rate for the U.S. Series I Savings Bond, which will be reset by the Treasury on Nov. 1.

At the time, I noted one month of data remained — meaning through the end of October — and I warned that things change quickly in the financial markets. And of course, things did change, with the 10-year real yield initially falling from 2.47% on Oct. 6 to 2.29% a week later, before settling back to 2.44% at the market close on Oct. 26.

So here are my current projections, based on real yield data through October 26:

Half-year average: On the left is the projection using the half-year average 10-year real yield, which through Oct. 26 is 1.78%. This is the number I predicted in my earlier projection .

In the last five rate resets, the average ratio of fixed-rate to real yield has been 0.63. If you apply that to the 1.78% half-year average, you end up with a projection of 1.12% for the November 1 rate reset. Because the Treasury sets the fixed rate only to one decimal point, that could result in a fixed rate of 1.1% or 1.2%, above the current rate of 0.9%.

Latest 10-year real yield spread: The current real yield for a 10-year TIPS is 2.44%, much higher than the half-year average of 1.78%. This is because yields have surged nearly 50 basis points higher in the last two months.

In recent years, the typical spread between the fixed rate and the 10-year real yield has been in the range of 50 to 60 basis points. I used 55 basis points in this example. The result is a projection of 1.9% for the November 1 rate reset.

Conclusion

I believe the half-year real yield predictor (which is pointing toward a fixed rate of 1.1% to 1.2%) is a more reliable forecast. However, a fixed rate that low would be a massive 120+ basis points below the real yield of a 10-year TIPS, which would make I Bonds much less desirable in comparison.

So, if the Treasury sees this yawning gap, it should be willing to set the I Bond’s fixed rate a bit higher. Or not. Who knows?

I think right now we are heading toward a fixed rate in the range of 1.1% to 1.4%. That’s based partly on data, partly on “gut feeling.” Or possibly “wishful thinking”?

If the fixed rate ends up being 1.2%, the new composite rate will be 5.16%, below the nominal yield of a 1-year Treasury bill at 5.39%. This is a problem for short-term investors, which I addressed in my recent article, “Are U.S. Series I Savings Bonds losing their appeal?“.

What comes next

The last day you can buy an I Bond with a 0.9% fixed rate will be Monday, Oct. 30, because TreasuryDirect requires that purchases be made with one business day remaining to clear. Purchases on Tuesday, Oct. 31, are likely to be shifted to the new fixed rate (unknown) and new variable rate (3.94%).

So it is possible that the Treasury will announce the new fixed rate on the morning of Tuesday, Oct. 31. This early release is what it did at the May 1 reset and I think it is a good idea. Buyers should understand what they are purchasing.

By the way, standard practice for I Bond investors is to buy close to the end of the month because a purchase on any day of the month gets a full first month of interest. So there is no need to jump quickly into the new I Bond, no matter what the fixed rate is.

I Bonds: A not-so-simple buying guide for 2023

Confused by I Bonds? Read my Q&A on I Bonds

Let’s ‘try’ to clarify how an I Bond’s interest is calculated

Inflation and I Bonds: Track the variable rate changes

I Bonds: Here’s a simple way to track current value

I Bond Manifesto: How this investment can work as an emergency fund

* * *

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Cash alternatives, I Bond, Inflation, Savings Bond, TreasuryDirect | 49 Comments

A quick update on Thursday’s 5-year TIPS auction

There is an explanation for everything, right?

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

As they say, “You learn something every day.” At least you should learn something every day. Thursday’s TIPS auction result, which you can read about here, caused some angst among readers: Why did the real yield come in below the market?

I was especially curious when I saw that the “when-issued” real yield prediction used by bond traders was 2.42%, well below the Treasury’s yield prediction of 2.57% for a 5-year TIPS (that prediction dropped to 2.43% after the market closed yesterday.)

Unfortunately, I can’t see the when-issued prediction until the auction closes. But if it was 2.42%, that indicated bond traders knew the Treasury estimate was too high. The auction actually got fairly lukewarm demand, and the resulting real yield ended up at 2.44%, above the when-issued prediction.

So what happened, and what can we learn from this?

Thursday’s lesson was about relearning something: Seasonal variations in TIPS yields. I discussed this topic in a post on Sept. 10: “‘Inflation Guy’ explains seasonal adjustment (or lack thereof)“, where inflation expert Michael Ashton explained why there are seasonal variations in TIPS yields.

But I clearly did not realize how much these seasonal variations affect one particular auction a year: the new 5-year TIPS issued each October since 2019. Could seasonal variations be the reason bond traders saw a yield of 2.42% while the Treasury and secondary market seemed to pointing to 2.57%?

The answer seems to be yes.

Beth Stanton, an editor for U.S. interest rates at Bloomberg, posted an excellent explanation on Twitter yesterday (I refuse to call it X, by the way). Here is how the series of tweets began:

And this is her explanation that followed:

Auctions of new 5Y TIPS have been held twice a year — in April & October — since 2019. (The June and Dec 5Y TIPS auctions are reopenings of one or the other.) …

The October auction usually produces a yield *significantly lower* than the current market yield of the one from April, despite maturing 6 months later. Normally in bonds (tho not so much lately), a longer maturity warrants a *higher* yield. …

The 5Y TIPS being sold on Thursday is trading at a yield of around 2.42%. The one sold in April (auction yield 1.32%) now yields around 2.53%. That’s a big gap for 6 months, especially since the new issue is the biggest-ever TIPS auction at $22b. …

The question is, why would someone buy the new issue at a yield of 2.42% when the old one can be had at 2.53%? The main reason is what inflation people call seasonality premium. …

Interest on TIPS is paid on a principal amount that’s indexed to the CPI — with a lag. The final index values for TIPS that mature in Oct are determined by the Aug CPI. The final index values for TIPS that mature in April are determined by the Feb CPI. …

The CPI used to adjust TIPS is the not-seasonally-adjusted one. And inflation has had a strong seasonal pattern. The pattern fell apart in 2020, but prior to that, prices reliably rose more early in the year than late in the year (when discounting is rampant). …

The Oct 5Y gets inflation accruals for six months after the April one matures. The months are March-Aug, which historically have been “better” overall than Sept-Feb. That gives the Oct issue extra value that gets reflected in a lower yield (i.e. higher price) than the April one. …

Other factors contribute to the Oct 5Y TIPS yielding less than the April, such the inverted yield curve (longer maturities in general command lower yields than shorter ones) & a liquidity premium for the new issue. But inflation seasonality is the biggest piece. /END

Again, this is something I knew about, but I hadn’t associated these seasonal fluctuations directly with the auction of a new 5-year TIPS each October . It’s a hard trend to decipher because these October auctions only have a 5-year history, dating to October 2019.

This chart proves Stanton’s point quite clearly:

The yield spreads get larger as the maturity date gets closer, because the effect of seasonality is strongest when fewer months remain. So, based on this analysis, a 14-basis-point yield spread looked predictable coming into Thursday’s auction. And it also indicates that investors at Thursday’s auction didn’t get “ripped off.”

Lesson learned. File this one away for future October auctions of 5-year TIPS.

* * *

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Inflation, Investing in TIPS | 67 Comments

New 5-year TIPS gets a real yield of 2.440%, again lower than expected

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

Also: See my update on why this real yield was actually logical (to bond traders).

Today’s Treasury auction of $22 billion in a new 5-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Security generated a real yield to maturity of 2.440%, continuing a recent trend of mildly disappointing results for TIPS at auction.

This is CUSIP 91282CJH5, which will mature Oct. 15, 2028. At yesterday’s market close, the U.S. Treasury estimated the real yield of a full-term 5-year TIPS at 2.57%, and a TIPS with a similar term was trading all morning with a real yield in the range of 2.54% to 2.61%. So the result of 2.440% was a downside surprise, indicating fairly strong demand for this new issue.

I was expecting a real yield and coupon rate topping 2.5%. Nevertheless, this TIPS broke through some historic milestones:

  • The real yield of 2.440% was the highest for any TIPS auction of this term going back to October 2008, during the heart of the U.S. financial crisis.
  • The coupon rate was set at 2.375%, the highest for any 5-year TIPS since the very first TIPS auction of this term in history, which generated a coupon rate of 3.625% on July 9, 1997.
  • The auction size was $22 billion, the largest for this term in history.

While the real yield came in a bit lower than expected, CUSIP 91282CJH5 measures up as a stellar investment, with a real yield 112 basis points higher than a similar auction just six months ago, on April 20.

Investment cost

Because this was an auction of a new TIPS, the coupon rate (2.375%) was set below the auctioned real yield (2.440%) and investors got CUSIP 91282CJH5 at a slight discount. The unadjusted price was 99.697130. Here is how that works out for a $10,000 investment:

  • Par value: $10,000
  • Inflation index on settlement date: 1.00225
  • Adjusted principal: $10,022.50
  • Unadjusted price: 0.99697130
  • Investment cost (adjusted principal x unadjusted price): $9,992.15
  • Plus, accrued interest: $10.41 (will be returned at first coupon payment)
  • Total cost: $10,002.56

Inflation breakeven rate

At the auction’s close, a 5-year Treasury note was trading with a nominal yield of 4.95%, creating an inflation breakeven rate of 2.51% for this TIPS. That is about 30 basis points higher than the breakeven for recent auctions of this term. Hard to explain, but the 5-year nominal yield actually rose today a few basis points, while this TIPS auction came in 10+ basis points lower than expected.

And the bid-to-cover ratio was 2.36, indicating just average demand. But the pre-auction “when issued” measurement of expected yield was 2.42%, below the actual result. So, the when-issued number most likely indicates strong advance orders for this TIPS from big-money investors, orders that are too big for the secondary market. And therefore those buyers were willing to accept a lower real yield.

Anyone have other theories?

Final thoughts

Today’s auction adds another notch to the view that buying TIPS on the secondary market is a wise move, since you know exactly the real yield and price you will be getting. We’ve had a slew of “slightly” disappointing TIPS auctions this year.

I wasn’t a buyer because my TIPS ladder is loaded with maturities in 2028. But honestly, this real yield of 2.440% was highly desirable, even if a little disappointing. Since it is a new issue, there was no direct comparison on the secondary market.

CUSIP 91282CJH5 will be reopened at auction on Dec. 21, 2023. It will be interesting to watch yield trends over the next two months.

Here is the history of 4- to 5-year TIPS auctions going back to 2017. Note there is nothing on the list that even comes close to a real yield of 2.440%.

* * *

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Investing in TIPS | 54 Comments

Are U.S. Series I Savings Bonds losing their appeal?

As a short-term investment? Yes. But for the long term? I Bonds are still attractive.

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

Just one year ago, U.S. Series I Savings Bonds were still paying 9.62% annualized for a full six months, followed by an almost-as-attractive 6.48%. Demand was so strong from small-scale investors that the TreasuryDirect website crashed under the flood of orders and new-account creations.

A lot has changed. Back in October 2022, annual inflation was running at 7.7% and a 1-year Treasury bill was yielding about 4.5%. At that time, the I Bond’s yield of 9.62% was irresistibly attractive. Today, annual inflation has slipped to 3.7% and the current I Bond has a composite interest rate of 4.30%, much lower than the yield on a 1-year T-bill at 5.41%.

As a short-term investment — meaning a holding period of about 1 year — the I Bond is no longer the shining star. However, as a longer-term investment, I Bonds are actually more attractive than a year ago, because the permanent fixed rate has increased from 0.0% in 2022 to 0.9% currently and probably higher than 1% at the Treasury’s next rate reset on November 1.

The short-term

The Treasury limits conventional purchases of I Bonds to $10,000 per person per calendar year, plus allows an option for $5,000 in paper I Bonds in lieu of a federal tax refund. I am assuming most I Bond investors have already bought their full 2023 allocation — either before May 1 at the 0.4% fixed rate, or after May 1 at 0.9% — but I have been hearing from people still waiting to make a decision: In October or after?

As I noted in an Oct. 8 article, I believe the I Bond’s fixed rate will be rising at the November 1 reset, probably to something around 1.2%, but even higher is possible. If that’s true, then both the permanent fixed rate and the six-month variable rate will be rising at the reset. So waiting until November or December to purchase makes the most sense, in my opinion.

Investors who have purchased their full allocation in 2023 also have the option to use the “gift-box” strategy, if they have a trusted partner to make the swaps. I have noted that the gift-box strategy is most effective when the fixed rate is high, since that rate is permanent.

If the fixed rate rises to 1.2% at the November 1 reset, here is how the new six-month composite rate will be calculated:

  • Fixed rate: 1.2%
  • Semiannual inflation rate: 1.97%
  • Composite rate formula: [0.012 + (2 x 0.0197) + (0.012 x 0.0197)]
  • Composite rate: 0.012 + 0.0394 + 0.0002364
  • Adding the parts: 0.051636
  • Rounding gives: 0.0516
  • Composite rate = 5.16%

So we could be looking at an annualized composite rate of 5.16% for six months for I Bonds purchased from November 2023 to April 2024. The rate would be higher if the fixed rate is set higher, of course. At a fixed rate of 1.4%, the composite rate would be 5.37%.

While 5.16% or 5.37% are attractive, these annualized yields will only last for six months, and the next variable rate is uncertain. The I Bond’s yield might be able to get close to the 5.41% yield of a 1-year T-bill, but there is a problem: Redeeming an I Bond after 1 year would incur a penalty of three months of interest. That’s not a problem with the T-bill.

Conclusion: As a short-term investment, a 1-year Treasury bill is the superior investment.

The long-term

On my “Q&A on I Bonds” page I have a list of all I Bond fixed rates going back to September 1998. The current fixed rate of 0.90% is the highest for any I Bond going back to November 2007. Before that, fixed rates of 1.0% or higher were the norm, occurring at each reset from September 1998 to November 2007. Here is that information:

So, if my analysis is correct, and the I Bond’s fixed rate rises to 1.2% or above at the November 1 reset, we will be entering a new era for I Bonds. The higher the fixed rate the better, because the fixed rate remains with an I Bond for 30 years or until it is redeemed. The variable rate is important for a short-term investor, but less important in the long term.

Any long-term investor in I Bonds has accumulated a collection of issues with 0.0% fixed rates. Those 0.0% I Bonds will be paying 3.94% after the November reset, rising from the current 3.38%. (The starting month depends on the month you originally purchased the I Bond.) That is well below current nominal yields on short-term Treasurys, bank CDs, even good money market funds.

A fixed rate of 1.2% or 1.4% is much more desirable than a fixed rate of 0.0%.

So, if you are committed to investing in I Bonds as a tax-deferred, inflation-protected savings strategy, the next I Bond is going to be desirable — either as an addition to your current holdings, or as a replacement for a set of 0.0% fixed rate I Bonds. Redeem the 0.0% bonds, buy the new I Bonds with a higher rate.

Should you immediately trash all your 0.0% I Bonds? I don’t think so. But I can see rolling over some issues — year by year — to either fund needed spending or to buy more attractive investments, such as an I Bond with a fixed rate of 1.2% or above.

Conclusion: An I Bond with a historically high fixed rate remains an attractive investment. Why? It creates a super-safe, tax-deferred, compounded-interest savings account with a flexible maturity date. I Bonds have rock-solid deflation protection and can’t ever lose a cent of accumulated value. I Bonds expand your tax-deferred investments and as a bonus the interest you earn is exempt from state income taxes.

But what about TIPS?

Any numbers-savvy financial nerd knows that Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities — right now — offer returns superior to I Bonds. There is a new 5-year TIPS being auctioned Thursday that should get a real yield to maturity of around 2.40%, possibly 100+ basis points over the I Bond’s new fixed rate.

So … 100 basis points? That is a big deal. TIPS are a strongly attractive investment right now. If you told me I could only have one inflation-protected investment, I would go with the TIPS in these market conditions. But you can have both, and I like having both.

My plan, again, for I Bonds is create a tax-deferred, inflation-protected savings account that can never lose a penny of accumulated value. That is a plus over a TIPS, which will rise and fall in market value every day and can lose value in a deflationary period. Although I am holding all my TIPS to maturity, I have to time their maturities to meet my needs. With I Bonds, after 5 years I have access to part or all of the accumulated holdings, with never a risk of losing value.

Conclusion: At times in the recent past, I Bonds with a 0.0% fixed rate were much more attractive than a TIPS with a real yield deeply negative to inflation. Back then, I bought I Bonds but shunned TIPS. Now the reverse is true. I am still buying I Bonds because of the simplicity and flexibility.

In fact: If the Treasury raises the I Bond’s fixed rate to 1.4% or higher, I would likely add to my holdings in 2023 with a “gift-box” swap with my wife, and then most likely buy again before the end of April 2024.

I Bond’s fixed rate should rise at the Nov. 1 reset

Confused by I Bonds? Read my Q&A on I Bonds

Let’s ‘try’ to clarify how an I Bond’s interest is calculated

Inflation and I Bonds: Track the variable rate changes

I Bonds: Here’s a simple way to track current value

* * *

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear. Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

Posted in Cash alternatives, I Bond, Inflation, Investing in TIPS, Treasury Bills, TreasuryDirect | 46 Comments