Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities

This wasn’t a big surprise, with gas prices soaring in the last few weeks. From the Associated Press report:

The Labor Department says the consumer price index rose 0.4 percent in February, the largest increase in 10 months. Gas prices rose 6 percent to account for most of the gain. … Excluding food and energy, so-called “core” prices rose just 0.1 percent. In the past 12 months, consumer prices have risen 2.9 percent, the same year-over-year change as last month.

TIPS investors will get the benefit of the 0.4% increase, a mixed blessing but appreciated when overall interest rates are so low. That’s the reason we buy TIPS, to protect against inflation.

The formal announcement is supposed to come Thursday, but the Treasury has already let it slip that it will auction a reissue of CUSIP 912828SA9 on March 22. This Treasury Inflation-Protected Security was first issued on Jan. 19, with a coupon rate of of 0.125%, but it auctioned at -0.046%, the lowest rate ever for a 10-year TIPS.

What can we expect? Since this is a reissue, you can check the current market value of this TIPS at sites like this. Here is the value as of Tuesday, March 13:

The yield, as has been the trend, has continued to decline and is currently -0.114%, which means that buyers yesterday were willing to accept 0.114% less than the rate of inflation over the next 10 years.

While that sounds like a miserable deal, it is … well, it is miserable. But it all depends on what you think the rate of inflation will be over the next 10 years, and how much you fear an unexpected bump in the rate of inflation. As of Tuesday, a 10-year traditional Treasury was paying 2.14%, meaning that this TIPS would be a better investment if inflation runs at 2.254% or more over 10 years.

While I think inflation might be higher than 2.254%, I can’t say that is a sure thing. And that is the dilemma for investors in this TIPS reissue.

Here is an interesting fact: On Jan. 19, when this TIPS was first issued, a 10-year traditional Treasury was selling for 2.01%. Since then it has increased to 2.14%, or 13 basis points. But the interest rate for this TIPS trading in the open market has fallen by about 7 basis points. That means the inflation breakeven point has risen by 20 basis points, or 0.20%. That is not a good thing.

From a Bloomberg report today:

The difference in yield between Treasury Inflation Protected Securities and nominal bonds, known as the break-even rate, indicated that investors expect consumer prices to rise 2.2 percent annually over the next five years, the highest since May. The average over the past year is 1.88 percent.

That was yesterday. Today … I’d say keep an eye on the 2022 Jan 15 TIPS value  in the next week. We could see some changes. With the stock market on a very steep incline, TIPS values should be decreasing and rates should be increasing.

The TIP ETF today fell fairly dramatically to $117.37, a 0.93% percent one-day loss. That means the yield on this 10-year TIPS will be getting more attractive. For TIPS buyers, this is good news.

If that 10-year TIPS rate appears to be heading toward zero or above, this looks like an attractive issue. If it dips even lower, buyer beware.

It seems like Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities are getting a lot of attention in 2012, and a lot of the attention isn’t positive. Then again, we’ve been hearing dire predictions for Treasuries in general for well over a year. But I do think that some of the current criticism is valid enough to consider when you are making investing decisions.

Dividend hunt? MarketWatch.com has an article titled ‘Why dividend stocks top TIPS for income investing‘, which lays out the pluses and minuses of the two investments:

… one income strategy is capturing the attention of investors and investment advisers alike: Swapping inflation-protected Treasurys, or TIPS, for dividend stocks yielding 3% or more.

“When someone says ‘I need more yield,’ my response is ‘You mean you need more risk in your portfolio,’” said Larry Swedroe, director of research for Buckingham Asset Management, LLC. “A dividend-paying strategy isn’t necessarily a bad one, but it’s much riskier. It’s not a substitute for fixed-income.”

… If inflation stays in a 1%-3% long-term range, dividend stocks should outperform TIPS, said Rob Arnott, chairman of asset manager Research Affiliates LLC and an expert in asset allocation.

But if inflation spikes, he noted, then stocks will get hit and even a fat dividend yield won’t offset the loss of capital.

Good article. I am a fan of dividend-paying stocks, really solid companies that have been steadily increasing their dividends. But those stocks are for the ‘risk’ portion of my portfolio, not for the ‘safe’ portion. Current super-low interest rates are forcing investors to look at riskier investments, and that is partly the reason stocks and commodity prices have been increasing. Does moving money out of safety and into risk make sense, especially with the stock market hitting multi-year highs?

For example, here is a one-year chart for a stock I own, a fairly boring (but solid) company in the food-service business. It pays a dividend of 3.4% and its stock price is up 7.2%, for a total gain of more than 10% — about the same as the TIP ETF last year.

Note the volatile path on the way to that 10% gain. This is a low-beta stock (0.64). This isn’t the picture I have in mind for my ‘safe’ investments.

Dire prediction for Treasuries. Bloomberg is carrying an article with the tantalizing headine, ‘Treasuries May Experience 20-Year Bear Market.’ It’s based on an interview with Paul Griffiths, head of fixed income at Aberdeen Asset Management.

Yields have fallen to historically low levels that are not justified by fundamentals … This makes the bond markets vulnerable to a sudden reversal. “Over time, and I’m talking about several years, bond yields may move dramatically. Our bias is towards a bear market, which may take 20-odd years to play out.”

Since Treasuries have been in a 30-year bull market, outperforming the stock market in that time, I can see the case for a reversal, with rates rising to ‘more normal’ levels, meaning higher than inflation for even short-term investments. If that happened suddenly, it would ravage the bond market (and probably the stock market, too). The Federal Reserve seems determined to keep short- and long-term rates low for the next two years, so the danger appears to be out in the future, but it is out there.

Warning from ‘the nation’s newspaper.’ You know a topic has reached its peak when USA Today weighs in on it. John Waggoner has an article titled, ‘The mystery: Why buy inflation-protected bonds?‘ He makes the case that TIPS prices have soared too high as interest rates have declined to record lows.

TIPS aren’t cheap right now. The yield on 10-year TIPS is -0.26%. At current yields, you won’t get enough interest to make up for the price of the bond. “We tell people that you have to be aware of what you’re buying,” Wright-Casparius says. “And you’re paying a premium at this juncture.”

If you think that inflation is going to rise sharply, TIPS will likely fare better than regular Treasury bonds. And if you buy TIPS from the Treasury and hold them to maturity, you won’t lose money. Even so, with rates so low, the big mystery will be how you’ll make much money with TIPS.

That’s actually a fair analysis. I think anyone buying TIPS today and expecting the out-sized gains of recent years is going to be disappointed. TIPS have become a ‘capital gain’ investment, instead of a super-safe source of inflation protection and income. If you buy and hold TIPS, they are really boring. They are the ballast of your portfolio, not the rising star.

A positive view. Larry Swedroe, a TIPS proponent, has an article on MarketWatch titled, ‘Time to slay these myths about TIPS.’ If offers the counter view that inflation protection makes TIPS an essential investment, and less volatile that nominal Treasuries:

Because TIPS fully hedge inflation, you can extend their maturity and earn the term premium without taking inflation risk. This is an important point many seem to miss. TIPS also have lower expected volatility than conventional Treasury bonds of the same maturity due to lower sensitivity to nominal interest rate movements.

Swedroe’s argument is primarily that TIPS are preferable to traditional Treasuries, even when they have a negative ‘real yield’ (after inflation). He makes the point that Treasuries also have a negative real yield against expected inflation, but no protection against unexpected inflation. He also recommends looking at the PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index Fund (STPZ) for investors worried about a future rise in interest rates.

Bill Gross, founder and managing director and of the PIMCO investment firm, is known for laying it all out in his opinion pieces on the PIMCO site. And his March 2012 treatise doesn’t disappoint. Although many investors seem to dislike Gross (example from Forbes: Bill Gross’s Bad Call Cost Investors $5.7 Trillion!), I am a fan.

He was wrongly negative about Treasuries last year, but I agreed with him at the time, so I was wrong too. We both were using too much common sense. Yields certainly cannot go lower? Oops, yes they can, in a world where the Federal Reserve is manipulating the market, forcing interest rates down. It’s called ‘financial repression’ and it might be the overriding force pushing up the price of stocks, gold, oil, gasoline. Gross recognizes this.

His article, titled ‘Defense,’ has many football metaphors (way too many, even mentioning Deion Sanders), but it is based on these three premises:

• Over the past 30 years, an offensively minded Federal Reserve and their global counterparts were printing money, lowering yields and bringing forward a false sense of monetary wealth.
• Successful investing in a deleveraging, low interest rate environment will require defensive in addition to offensive skills.
• The PIMCO defensive strategy playbook: Recognize zero bound limits and systemic debt risk in global financial markets. Accept financial repression but avoid its impact when and where possible. Emphasize income we believe to be relatively reliable/safe; seek consistent alpha.

Gross’ argument is that Fed has been the ‘Wizard of Oz’ acting behind the curtain for 30 years, driving up the price of assets and steadily driving down interest rates. While that has created wealth, it also causes economic destruction. Here is a key line:

Low yields, instead of fostering capital gains for investors via the magic of present value discounting and lower credit spreads, begin to reduce household incomes, lower corporate profit margins and wreak havoc on historical business models connected to banking, money market funds and the pension industry. The offensively oriented investment world that we have grown so used to over the past three decades is being stonewalled by a zero bound goal line stand. Investment defense is coming of age.

Gross presents this chart to show the destructive force of super-low interest rates on families with savings, who are now facing debt payments much higher than interest earned:

And it’s not just households who are hurt. Gross points out that near-zero interest rates are ravaging the business models of insurance companies and banks.

What do do?

Gross continues his silly football metaphors with a ‘Ready, Set, Hut 1, Hut 2’ offensive strategy that pretty much recommends a PIMCO fund. Oh, well.

His defensive strategy, the real core of this article, just says ‘Emphasize income we believe to be relatively reliable/safe.‘

And what is that? He doesn’t say.

Just read the article yourself.

My interest in all this is that Gross is joining Charles Schwab in criticizing the Fed’s destructive policy of driving down interest rates, from 30 days to 30 years.

I agree that these artificially low interest rates, well below the current rate of inflation, are dangerous and destructive. Honestly, these rates make no sense. Why do investors accept them?

Answer: The Fed has guaranteed that this policy will continue well into 2014.